Saturn Season Astrology

A stylized illustration of a planet with rings, resembling a cat's face with ears.

Tag: Galactic Anti-Center

  • Galactic Center Thoughts (part XXVII)

    Galactic Center Thoughts (part XXVII)

    In 2021, I did a blog post about how famous whistleblowers seemed to be GC activated, with a large majority of them having a planet, etc. conjunct the GC. It was always my plan to dive into this further because I think it’s really interesting…so that’s what this blog post is about.

    While the idea of the Galactic Center having an affinity for whistleblowers isn’t a novel concept on it’s own, the deeper research into this IS novel. I have not seen anyone else make some of the connections that I have made over the years regarding what follows.

    Why the tie between the Galactic Center and whistleblowers?

    The most simple answer is the Galactic Center is in Sagittarius (currently at 27° 13′ Sagittarius), and one of the ways that Sagittarius energy expresses itself is through honesty and telling the truth (among other ways). The definition for whistleblower is “a person, often an employee, revealing information about activity within a private or public organization that is deemed wrongful – whether it be illegal, immoral, illicit, unsafe, unethical, or fraudulent “(definition comes from wikipedia). The above definition feels like it would pull at the Sagittarius strings of honesty and calling out things that are dishonest.

    Another thing about the Galactic Center is that it is hidden – it’s literally a black hole in space that you can’t see. This very thing feels like it ties into the notion of Galactic Center-y people (and even Galactic Anti-Center-y people in a differenet way) bringing forth information on “hidden” activities.

    Galactic Center, Jupiter Retrograde & “Protection”

    The Galactic Center not only appears to be a function for “truth telling,” but it also appears to provide some element of protection for the person with planets conjunct the Galactic Center. What REALLY appears to provide the most protection from blowback and repercussions is when the whistleblower has planets, etc. conjunct the GC AND Jupiter Retrograde in their chart. Why does Jupiter matter? Because it’s the planetary ruler OF the Galactic Center. Why does the retrograde motion of Jupiter matter? Because, throughout the years of my research, it seems that direct planets conjunct the GC function more like retrograde planets than direct planets (the GC warps, distorts, transforms, changes, etc.). This seems to cause Jupiter retrograde to be more aligned with the GC than Jupiter direct.
    It’s also worth noting that Jupiter in the post shadow period ALSO seems to count here as we saw in the original 2021 blog post, and as we’ll see further into this post.

    Having both a planet, angle, etc. conjunct the Galactic Center AND having Jupiter retrograde seems to offer a level of “protection” to the whistleblower or “truth teller.” What does that mean exactly? The person won’t see much punishment or blowback from their whistleblowing…or if they DO see punishment or blowback it feels very minimized to what could be.
    The protection in this case could mean the person just doesn’t see any prison time (a la Edward Snowden – covered in the 2021 post – who certainly saw blowback but NOT prison time since he was able to escape to Russia before being arrested).

    Really, I’d extend this level of protection to the Galactic Center & Jupiter Rx person beyond just whistleblowing activities. For instance, the disgraceful asshole we have as the president of the United States in 2026 has Galactic Center contacts AND Jupiter retrograde. I have long suspected that he won’t see any repercussions for his actions despite being impeached and other shit like that. This REALLY pissess me off, and I would LOVE to be proven wrong about this theory and him to actually face some kind of punishment….but here we are in 2026 and ain’t shit happening in that regard.

    The people in this post

    The people chosen for this post are all known for whistleblowing in some capacity. They were not used in the post in 2021 because most of these people don’t have a time of birth on file (so I set the charts without a time of birth to 12 pm)…and most of the people in the 2021 post DID have a time of birth on file (which is why I went with them first). Also to note: there are a lot of whistleblowers who don’t even have a publicly known date of birth which is frustrating to me as a researcher 😆. In saying that, there very well could be well known whistleblowers that don’t have ANY Galactic Center (or Galactic Anti-Center, aka “the lightning rod”) contacts, but they aren’t a part of the research because their DOB’s aren’t known to the public. I’m working with what is available to me at the time of publication.

    Okay! Now that we’re all clear on what I’m doing in this post, let’s dive into the people and their astrology charts.

    Reality Winner’s Astrology Chart

    Reality Winner's astrology chart

    The chart above belongs to Reality Winner (time of birth unknown), who is known for being a USAF veteran and NSA Translator. While working for the NSA she leaked an intelligence report to the media about Russia’s interference in the 2016 US presidential election.

    Okay, so while she certainly has markers for wanting to blow a whistle of some kind (Mercury Retrograde conjunct the Galactic Center!), she doesn’t have Jupiter retrograde in her chart which DOES seem to be an important piece of “protection” for people who do blow the whistle on something. While she is out of prison now, she was given the longest prison sentence (5 years and 3 months in federal prison) ever imposed on someone for unauthorized release of government classified information.

    Colleen Rowley’s Astrology Chart

    Colleen Rowley's Astrology Chart

    The chart above belongs to Colleen Rowley (time of birth unknown), a former FBI agent who is known for testifying to the senate and 9/11 commission that the FBI ignored information about the 9/11 attacks before they occurred.

    She has a very Galactic Center-y chart, with the Sun and Mercury conjunct the GC (and even though it’s wide, I’d count the North Node in Capricorn here, too). She’s part of the Pluto in Leo generation that has Pluto almost exactly trine the GC…meaning she has a way to bring the Galactic Center energy down to earth. Also important: she has Jupiter retrograde which does feel like it provided a level of “protection” for her whistleblowing activities. She did not see any repercussions (that I’m aware of) for testifying.

    Mark Whitacre’s Astrology Chart

    Mark Whitacre's Astrology Chart

    The chart above belongs to Mark Whitacre (time of birth unknown) who is known for being the highest level corporate executive to become a FBI whistleblower (aka: a cooperative witness for the FBI). He was the president of Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) and the company was being investigated for price fixing.

    Okay, so Whitacre doesn’t have anything conjunct the Galactic Center, but he DOES have Mars in Gemini conjunct the Galactic Anti-Center (GaC seems to function as a lightning rod). This stands out because it was his wife that got him to go the FBI, telling him that if he didn’t tell them about the bullshit, that she would (lollllll). Jupiter is not retrograde in his chart (and it’s technically in detriment in Virgo AND square the Galactic Center). Without Jupiter retrograde or conjunctions the Galactic Center, he appears to be wide open to some kind of blowback from whistleblowing activities. He ended up serving 8.5 years of a 9 year sentence in federal prison for tax evasion & fraud.

    Peter Buxtun’s Astrology Chart

    Peter Buxtun's Astrology Chart

    The chart above belong’s to Peter Buxtun (time of birth unknown) who was the epidemiologist for the US Public Health Service that blew the whistle on the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. He leaked information on this experiment to someone at the associated press, and he is the reason that this disgusting experiment was shut down in 1972.

    Buxtun has Mars conjunct the Galactic Center which definitely points to him wanting to keep his head in the sand (Scorpio 12th House traditionally ruled by Mars) but just not being able too – the Galactic Center seems to have too much of a push towards the truth. Jupiter is not retrograde in his chart, but Jupiter turned direct the day before Buxtun’s DOB in 1937 which makes me think he is still afforded the protection of Jupiter Rx. As far as I know, he never saw any blowback or “punishment” for revealing this experiment.

    Daniel Ellsberg’s Astrology Chart

    Daniel Ellsberg Astrology Chart

    The chart above belongs to Daniel Ellsberg who was a military analyst that became known for releasing the Pentagon Papers in 1971. These documents told (more of) the full story of what the US was doing in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War.

    Ellsberg has a time of birth on file, so I am comfortable counting his Moon conjunct the Galactic Center…which makes him GC activated and (probably) pushed him towards wanting to reveal things in the first place. His Sun is trine the Galactic Center, which is where the GC stuff was brought down to earth. Now, he does NOT have Jupiter Rx in his chart (it is exalted in Cancer, though)….but he was born during the post-retrograde shadow. We’ve seen before that the post retrograde shadow seems like it can offer some level protection to the native. He was charged under the Espionage Act (along with other charges related to theft and conspiracy), but ultimately all of his charges were dismissed.

    Sherron Watkins’ Astrology Chart

    Sherron Watkins Astrology Chart

    The chart above belongs to Sherron Watkins (time of birth unknown), the former Vice President of corporate development at the Enron Corporation. She is the one who blew the whistle on all of Enron’s fuckery in the 1990s.

    She has Saturn Rx conjunct the Galactic Center, which might imply that she felt a heavy responsibility (Saturn) to blow the whistle on all of the bullshit afoot. Her chart is interesting to me because while she has the GC contact she does NOT have Jupiter retrograde. Her Jupiter in Scorpio could be considered in the post shadow period (Jupiter turned direct on July 20, 1959), but it’s further into the post shadow period than others in this study. For this reason I actually expected to see MORE blowback in her case. That’s not to say she didn’t see any blowback though – she was demoted from her VP position and she faced considerable criticism for not alerting the government of the fraud earlier than she did.

    Frances Haugen’s Astrology Chart

    Frances Haugen Astrology Chart

    The chart above belongs to Frances Haugen. Not only was her time of birth unknown but it was hard as hell to find her DOB (so take this one with a grain of salt). Because of how hard it was to find her DOB, its very possible that the DOB I found isn’t correct. Why include her then? Because her whistleblowing on Facebook’s bullshit (the 2021 Facebook leak) is recent history.

    Going with this DOB, she has her Mars, Neptune & Jupiter conjunct the GC. This would make her inclined to want to call out Facebook’s bullshit (that it was aware of the harmful effects from it’s platforms and did nothing about it because it wouldn’t make them money to do something about it). She does not have Jupiter retrograde, but what she DOES have is Jupiter conjunct the Galactic Center….and from the research it seems that planets conjunct the GC function MORE like retrograde planets than direct planets. This, combined with her natal Jupiter in the post retrograde shadow, feels like it offered her a level of protection from any major blowback.

    This is one of four posts applying the same pattern to different groups: whistleblowers, conspiracy theorists, belief leaders, and whistleblowers part II (this post).

    Want the rest of the galactic stuff? Here’s everything I’ve written about the Galactic Center and the other deep space points — five-plus years of research, all in one place.

    Oh! And if you would like an astrology reading from me, you can get one here 🙂

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part XVI or: a brief introduction to the Super Galactic Center

    Correction (2026): the instructions below originally pointed at the north galactic pole (“Gal.Pole, GPol”) rather than the Super Galactic Center. You want Messier 87 on astro.com’s additional objects list. Thanks to jungatheart for catching this in the comments back in 2022.

    The 2° Libra position holds, though. Philip Sedgwick, who’s been working with these points since 1976, gives the Super Galactic Center at 2° Libra 03′. I interviewed him about all of this here. What I got wrong was the claim that the SGC moves faster than the GC — it doesn’t. Both move about a degree every 72 years.

    Here is the video that goes into the Super Galactic Center (if you are more of watcher than a reader). If you would like for me to read for you (Galactic stuff or otherwise), you can have me do that here.

    I wanted to type up something quickly about the Super Galactic Center, to at least acknowledge its presence. I wasn’t really going to even get into the Super GC yet, but I felt like it was time for it to be mentioned, especially with more people asking when squares to the GC will be explored. The Super Galactic Center ties into the squares with the GC because of where it is located in the chart – right now it is at 2-degrees Libra. This is within the window of orb that I would be looking at for squares to the GC.

    To pull the Super Galactic Center in your chart, go to astro.com and create your natal chart. Then go to “extended chart selection.” Once there, go down to where it says “additional objects” and find the “list of fixed stars” (and click on it). Go down the list until you get to the M’s, find “Messier 87” and pick it. Then pull your chart again and you will see where the Super Galactic Center is in your chart.

    The notion of the Super Galactic Center existing, and how to read it alongside the GC in our galaxy (or even if it should be read alongside the GC of our galaxy) definitely has me thinking and theorizing and trying to make sense of shit. This is why I’m hesitant to start looking at the squares to the GC since those most definitely beg questions about the Super GC and how to integrate this into the mix (since planets, etc. that conjunct the Super GC and square the GC that happen to fall in Virgo and Libra would definitely be impacted here). It also begs the question of something like a Super Galactic Anti-Center – does something like this exist? I figure SOMETHING must exist opposite the Super Galactic Center, but I can’t find anything about that (though, to be fair, I haven’t done a substantial amount of searching on that subject yet). For these reasons, the squares might be the last piece of the GC puzzle that I’ll be looking at (I’m not 100% firm on this, but I could see it playing out this way).

    There are also questions about HOW to even READ and WEAVE the Super Galactic Center into all of this to begin with. The Super GC isn’t even in this galaxy which makes me wonder if it should be read alongside the GC at all (or incorporated in a different way). THIS is DEEP SPACE astrology shit and I’m trying to make sense of exactly how to incorporate it into regular chart reading. I mean, the GC is part of OUR galaxy so it does make sense to incorporate it into regular chart reading. The Super GC though? I almost get the sense that while it can be read in the natal chart like other things in our galaxy, it might signify something else all together as well. What that is? Lol I have some theories but nothing super firm yet.
    -My friend Chris made the comment a while back that, perhaps, the Galactic Center of our galaxy is like an umbilical cord to something (other dimensions, other realms, The Creator itself, etc.). This got me thinking in terms of the Super GC, and that maybe the GC of our Galaxy is like the umbilical cord that ties us to the Super Galactic Center of the metagalaxy (and the metagalaxy/super cluster of galaxies has been given the name Laniakea.)
    -If we think about it THIS way (the way mentioned above), then maybe the GC is tied to the Super GC, but they are almost on different “planes” or “levels” or something? Like while maybe they can be read together, they do need to be separated in some way (since one is in our galaxy and the other is in the metagalaxy and so far from our galaxy).
    -Even if they aren’t separated by way of the chart, and both the GC and the Super GC are read together, I think it might be important to think about the Super GC as if it exists “somewhere else,” even if reading it alongside everything in the chart. I’m still trying to make sense of exactly HOW I’m thinking about this, lol.

    I have the knee jerk inclination to think that stuff conjunct the Super Galactic Center is probably important on it’s own (regardless if someone has anything also conjunct the GC or not). As I have mentioned before, I do think people who have GC conjunctions (or even oppositions, or BOTH) probably are more tuned into the GC, albeit in different ways depending on what the contacts are. I might think that conjunctions to the Super GC function in the same way – making the person more “galactically inclined” in the way that conjunctions to the GC seem to function. I wouldn’t be surprised if the galactic links are a little different (and maybe even a little further OUT into deep space) when you see conjunctions to the Super GC. This will all have to be fleshed out further over time, but yeah, I do think stuff conjunct the Super GC is probably really important. And the squares between stuff conjunct the GC and the Super GC seem like they would be incredibly important – really pushing the person to embrace their galactic inclinations, perhaps?

    I decided to look at how many people in the Galactic Center research so far have squares to the GC. Even though I’m not sure exactly HOW the oppositions to the Super GC function, I’m including them in this tally, too. I’m not really sure what to do WITH this tally, lol, but I figure “what the hell – let’s see anyway.”
    -Just for reference, I would be looking for anything conjunct the super GC within 10-degrees applying or separating. Same thing for the opposition to the Super GC (I know that mother fucker means something).
    -I came back with 53% of participants of the research so far having SOMETHING conjunct the Super GC in Virgo/Libra.
    -I came back with 48% of participants of the research so far having SOMETHING conjunct what MIGHT be like the Super Galactic Anti-Center.
    –Keep in mind that all of these people also have GC conjunctions and/or oppositions.
    –Both of these findings definitely make me want to dip my feet into this sooner than later, hahahahaha.

  • Galactic Center Thoughts XIV or How to *maybe* use this shit in chart weaving.

    Galactic Center Thoughts XIV or How to *maybe* use this shit in chart weaving.

    Here is the first video that goes along with the blog post. Here is the second video.

    ***Since there are so many ways that the GC seems like it can function, and so many moving pieces that seem like they can correlate with the GC energy (and even the GaC energy), I’m going to try to streamline this blog post to the best of my ability without it going all over the fucking place. This still might happen in certain parts of this post – but hopefully not too much (crosses fingers). I also want to mention that this post will primarily deal with what to DO with all the energy from the GC and how to best utilize it to the person’s advantage.**

    At this point you might be wondering HOW any of these theories can actually be put INTO practice (there have been some questions that I’ve gotten recently about HOW the Galactic Center could be used in chart weaving/chart delineation). I have some IDEAS about that, but I wouldn’t take ANY of these as absolute truth. These are some ideas that you should try playing around with on your own (with your own natal chart and those of other people) and see if they “fit.” I AM JUST FUCKING WITH ASTROLOGY HERE, and fucking with things is one of the ways that we learn new things. DO NOT HOLD ME TO ANY OF THIS.
    -Also keep in mind while reading this that the tighter the orb is between the GC and a planet via conjunction and with the GaC and a planet via conjunction, the stronger the impact the conjunction will have on the person. Same thing could be said with a planet (et. al) trine the GC – the tighter this orb, the “better” a translator the trine probably will be.

    I. Galactic Center by House – No Conjunctions or Oppositions, No Jupiter Rx, No Trines to GC
    -Take a look at this past blog post of mine to give you some ideas about HOW the GC might manifest in your life (or the life of whoever’s chart you’re looking at). Definitely don’t take this as gospel and come up with your own notions if you find those don’t completely fit the chart that you’re looking at (the houses can represent a myriad of different areas of life, all of which I probably didn’t cover in those “examples”).
    -Think of it like this: the House where the GC falls is going to be filled with a lot of energy just due to the nature of the GC. This could amplify this house for the “good” or the “bad,” and it could so distort/warp this house and the areas of life that the house has domain over.
    -The “lightning” will still strike on the opposite side of the chart, where the GaC falls (this will STILL happen, in my opinion, even if there are no conjunctions to the GC or the GaC). Any overflow of energy will probably still make it’s way over the GaC (or something like that) which could cause the house where the GaC falls have some “issues,” like blinding to any issues that are present in this house in the first place.
    -If there are no GC or GaC conjunctions, I might think that while the GC STILL matters in the chart, the effect on the person from a holistic view of the chart probably won’t be THAT intense over all.
    -If the GC/GaC Axis happens to fall in two houses (and for this I’d be looking 5-degrees applying or separating from the GC/GaC since there is no planet involved), then both houses would probably feel the impact from the GC and the GaC. Having this going on over two houses might actually lessen the impact in each house some since it’s spread out over two houses (two houses with the GC/two houses with the GaC).

    II. Galactic Center by House – No Conjunctions or Oppositions, but Jupiter IS Rx and/or Trine(s) to the GC
    -The person who has no conjunctions or oppositions to the GC, but DOES have Jupiter Rx probably IS able to “tune into” the GC energy in a similar way as a person with planets conjunct the GC, though it’s not exactly the same (there does feel like there probably isn’t as much energy involved in this tuning in though, who knows, this might end up being to the person’s benefit overall). There probably is an underlying understanding of the energy that IS going on at the GC by the house that it falls.
    -The person who has no conjunctions or oppositions to the GC but DOES have a trine to the GC seems that they would have a clear translator to bring the energy from the GC down to earth by planet (and everything else I’ve looked at thus far), house, and sign. Since they have no conjunctions to the GC or oppositions to the GaC, they may not be as aware that there is much to translate and ground in the first place – they just might kind of naturally have a nice translation of the energy.
    -For the person who has no conjunctions or oppositions to the GC, but they have BOTH a trine to the GC AND Jupiter Rx, this makes me think that the person probably is more aware that there is something to translate from the GC in the first place (at least as an undercurrent if nothing else), and the trine gives them the ability to DO this.


    III. Conjunctions to the Galactic Center (just looking at the conjunctions for a second)
    Let’s talk for the second about the notion of a “Galactic Center” personality. Through my research thus far, I have noticed there have been some ideas that have been tossed around about the Galactic Center and what this might do to the personality of the person that has GC contacts. Some of these ideas I agree with, and some of them I don’t (these ideas usually include all aspects to the GC, and for the purposes of this “block” I am ONLY talking about GC conjunctions). Really, I feel like the GC is too much of a wild card to be able to nail down EXACTLY what it will do to a planet (et. al) that is conjunct the GC with absolute certainty – I just don’t think it works THAT way. However, there are some definite possibilities of things that the GC could do to planets that conjunct it.
    -Amplify & charge the nature of the planet (et. al)
    -Warp & distort the nature of the planet (et. al)
    –Depending on what else is going on with that planet (et. al) in the chart will kind of give you an idea of if this is going to swing in an “easy” or “challenging” direction (and hell, the GC is so fucking weird I wouldn’t be surprised if it could even have a “neutral” effect at times – still “charging” the planet, but somehow neutralizing anything “easy” or “challenging” going on with it by way of the rest of the chart).
    **For instance, if you had someone with their Sun conjunct the GC, you might find someone who’s identity/ego is amplified or distorted (and this could be something like the ego being massively inflated all the way over to the person’s ego/identity being almost non-existent). THIS IS LITERALLY JUST A FOR INSTANCE – you would need to take EVERYTHING in the chart into account to know if this actually fits (or which way it swings). Shit, it could even swing different ways at different times.
    -Seeking for truth and belief, in some way, also seems to be a hallmark of people with GC conjunctions (even if the person tries to ignore such things, which lol, could definitely happen). Where this comes out will depend on the house that the GC falls, and the planet (et. al) conjunct the GC will show WHAT is being sought out via truth and belief in the first place.
    –There usually is some kind of amplification, charge, warping, distortion, surrounding this. This part seems like it’s EVEN MORE amplified if Jupiter happens to be RX somewhere in this person’s chart (though it does seem to exist regardless if Jupiter is Rx or not).
    -Conjunctions to the GC feel like they are protective in a way (they are one side of the “protective coin” with Jupiter Rx being protective/giving protection as well). To only have one or other does afford a person “protection” but not completely.
    —What do I mean “protection?” Really, I could see this going a few different ways. With the example of whistleblowers, those that had GC conjunctions and Jupiter Rx seemed to fair better overall with blowing their whistle (even if they had a “weird” relationship with doing so). You could correlate this to ANYTHING that a person with GC conjunctions and Jupiter Rx may want to do (that feels fueled by the GC – and here you would be looking at Sagittarian themes even if the planet conjunct the GC fell in Capricorn). If they are actually ABLE to do this in any kind of way that makes sense would also depend on if a trine exists to the GC or not.
    -I do think, and there is no proof of this (this one is a hard one to “prove”) but that the GC is probably a connection to other dimensions, other galaxies (it could very easily connect to the Super Galactic Center which is the center of the metagalaxy that our galaxy is inside). Chris, a friend of mine, made the comment on a previous blog post that the GC might be like an umbilical cord, what connects us to other places and realms. I think this is probably pretty right the fuck on – it feels right on to me. We weren’t talking about it being an umbilical cord to the Super Galactic Center, but it probably functions as such, too.
    –This could cause the person with GC conjunctions be given information (like downloads) to the planets that are conjunct the GC. What would be downloaded would probably tie in heavily with WHAT planet (et. al) is conjunct the GC. Certain planets (et. al) conjunct the GC would probably best best to get certain downloads over other planets (et. al). For instance, someone with Uranus conjunct the GC would probably do better with downloads of a revolutionary nature than someone who had, say, the Moon conjunct the GC.

    IV. Conjunctions to the Galactic Anti Center (NO conjunction to the GC)
    For the person who ONLY has a conjunction to the GaC (and nothing conjunct the GC), that planet (et. al) conjunct the GaC does appear to still act as a massive lightning attractor for this area of the chart – and this area of the chart is already an attractor as it is since it does seem like this is WHAT the GaC does anyway (having a planet there (et. al) just gives it a very CLEAR vehicle to attract the energy from the GC).
    -This area of the person’s life might already be a little cloudier, a little more blinded, and probably takes a lot of the impact from *something* like an overflow of energy from the GC. Since this area of the sky is “calmer” (and it IS calm when you look at it against ALL the energy of the GC on the opposite side of the sky/chart), when it is shocked it’s like it might not know what to do WITH the shock. Really, it doesn’t have to DO anything – this planet (et. al) just absorbs the shock as it is (and if I’m being honest, probably does have some “damage” just by virtue of being here). I’m not trying to imply whatever is conjunct the GaC is fucked or anything like that, but when reading this planet (et. al) I would read it from a slightly more “challenging” angle, even if it makes nothing but nice aspects throughout the rest of the chart, just due to this damage that it does seem to take.
    -What the planet (et. al) expresses might be a little more blinded or clouded over to any issues that it has throughout the rest of the chart. When the GC shoots over energy to the GaC, which probably does happen more frequently when there is no planet conjunct the GC to absorb any of the energy AT the GC, the planet (et. al) conjunct the GaC may not know what “hit” it and cause it to kind of “spiral” (maybe just a little bit). Knowing the “shadow” side of the planet (et. al) conjunct the GaC in question feels really important to keep that spiraling from happening.
    -If a person has a planet (et. al) sextile to the GaC, they have a way to ground the shocks and strikes to the GaC (which probably helps this “spiral” from happening).
    -If the person with a sextile to the GaC/trine to the GC happens to have Jupiter Rx, they probably are more familiar with the GC energy (even without having a conjunction to the GC). This probably helps the person to at least understand these shocks that happen to a planet (et. al) conjunct the GaC a little better (someway, somehow).

    V. Conjunctions to the Galactic Center and the Galactic Anti-Center
    -For the person who has BOTH sets of conjunctions to the GC and the GaC, they have massive amounts of energy from the GC being absorbed by the planet (et. al) that is conjunct the GC , and they have a planet (et. al) to take the overflow of energy from the GC – something there to function like “here kitty kitty kitty” (an attractor) for ALL of that energy. This feels like it could be incredibly polarizing – it could either make the person incredibly polarizing to other people (either loving them or hating them), or it could just make the person feel very polarized per the areas of life we’re talking about by house and regarding the planets involved. I realize an opposition is already a polarity as it is, but in this case the polarity feels like it’s on steroids. On area of their life has so much fucking energy in it, and the other end is getting the shit shocked out of it (which is polarizing).
    -I would still think that the planet (et. al) conjunct the GaC would take on some damage here, though the person might be better able to handle the damage a little better due to also having something conjunct the GC. While the planet (et. al) conjunct the GC
    -For the person who has no trine to the GC/sextile to the GaC but has those conjunctions, it almost seems like the energy would keep going on and on in loop, which could make life a little more challenging. I also feel like it’s as possible that when the loop can’t keep going, the energy ends up shocking the entire chart (this would probably be some kind of trigger via transit or something – I’m not totally sure WHAT that trigger would be yet). I think in this kind of case, it’s probably really important that these people are familiar with their own Mercury and Jupiter in their natal charts (since the GC in Sagittarius and the GaC is in Gemini) – they need to understand the “easy” and “challenging” things about these planets in their chart, really know these motherfuckers like the back of their hand. This is the case even if Jupiter and Mercury are direct (though, I actually think, in this case should Mercury and/or Jupiter be Rx, it might make NOT having the trine even easier since Mercury Rx feels like it has affinity with the GaC and Jupiter Rx definitely has an affinity with the GC).
    -For the person who has conjunctions to the GC and the GaC, and happen to have a trine (or trines) to the GC/a sextile (or sextiles) to the GaC, these people REALLY need to understand that fucking trine planet for THIS is how the person translates stuff from the GC. The more planets the person has trine the GC, the more possible ways of translation the person has at their disposal. Does the person with multiple trines use them all? Maybe, maybe not. The point is that they have multiple avenues for translation, and should get to know each planet very well (how each planet dances with the rest of of their chart).

    VI. Person with Conjunctions to the GC, GaC, or both BUT NO TRINES or SEXTILES from GC/GaC
    -When someone has a planet (et. al) conjunct the GC, or a planet (et. al) conjunct the GaC, or BOTH, but NO TRINE/SEXTILE to the GC/GaC, this makes the person’s Mercury and Jupiter very important in their chart (I think both can serve as de-facto translators in cases like this). BOTH Jupiter and Mercury seem like they would be important, though depending on what Jupiter and Mercury are doing in the chart, this could cause one to be a better translator/grounder over the other. I’m still playing around with this some, but I do think this is probably how the translation and grounding is able to happen with the absence of a trine/sextile to the GC or GAC. If one of those planets happen to be Rx in the chart, I would definitely look to the Rx planet first.

    VII. Other Factors to Consider
    1. Jupiter Rx anywhere in the chart
    -For the person who has Jupiter Rx and conjunctions to the GC and GaC, it seems like there is a “protection” that this person is afforded. Jupiter Rx DEFINITELY seems to be a protective force for people that have this and have a conjunction to the GC. If they have a trine to the GC as well, this seems like they have the “protection” to translate ANYTHING from the GC and bring it “safely” down the earth (and I mention this because of the examples that I’ve looked at so far with whistleblowers, conspiracy theorists, and other famous people). The GC feels protective in a weird ass way, too, so having BOTH a conjunction to the GC and Jupiter Rx does seem to add a layer of protection for these people to do what they feel called (or are called) to do. Jupiter Rx, since it feels like it is so in-tune with the GC energy as it is, will also also act as an amplifier to utilize the GC energy in some form or fashion.
    2. Other Retrograde Planets
    -Though I do think the GC has the most correlation with Jupiter Rx (especially in a protective/protection capacity for the person), I do think all Rx planets have an affinity for the GC. The Retrograde Planets don’t cause someone to be tuned into the GC antenna necessarily, but those that already are tuned into the GC Axis AND have Rx planets in their chart feel like they might have an amplified sense of being tuned-in.
    –When I talk about Rx planets here, I’m not talking about just having one planet Rx, unless we’re talking about the Chart Ruler – that one planet might be enough to amplify being tuned into the GC, or having a planet conjunct the GC Rx – this one planet might be enough to really tune one in as well. In most cases, I’m thinking a Retrograde heavy chart, as in 3 or more planets being Rx and this allowing the person to better tune into the GC energy.
    3. Out of Bounds Planets (here is a blog post about this with correlation to the GC)
    -These definitely feel like they have an affinity for GC energy. They function as wildcards much like the GC seems to be a wild card as well. Having planets conjunct the GC and/or conjunct the GaC, and having OOB planets, seems like it would only amplify the GC’s energy and/or the strikes and shocks that the GaC takes on. An OOB planet that is actually conjunct the GC and/or the GaC seems like what I said before is probably amplified EVEN MORE.
    4. Chiron (here is a blog post about Chiron with correlation to the GC)
    -Chiron feels like it DOES have a similar vibe to the GC in terms of both of them being a “bridge” – Chiron being the bridge between the inner and outer planets, and the GC being a bridge between our galaxy and what is out there beyond our galaxy (or perhaps, what we are connected to). I’m not sure that Chiron in the natal chart automatically tunes you into the GC on it’s own without having any involvement with the GC axis already mentioned (though I do think they have a similar vibe in being “bridges”). I might think that having Chiron Rx could turn the GC antenna up a notch (even if Chiron Rx has nothing to do with the GC Axis and everything mentioned above).
    -Having Chiron direct or Rx involved with the GC Axis, or trine the GC, probably does cause Chiron to function as an amplifier for the GC energy.
    –Chiron is still one I’m playing with (or less “leaning” one particular way or the other). Honestly, I’m still playing with all this fucking shit lol.
    5. DISPOSITORS TO THE GC
    I feel like a fucking moron for never mentioning this before but you definitely need to take dispositions into account here in terms of planets conjunct the GC or conjunct the anti-center. For instance, lets say that someone has Venus conjunct the GC. This means that the houses that have Libra and Taurus on the house cusp will bend to Venus and will also influence the GC. Same thing could be said about planets conjunct the GaC.

    In the next blog post, we will go over an example chart (or a couple of examples if I can get clearance on using other charts beyond the one) on how to *maybe* put this into practice

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part XII

    Galactic Center Thoughts part XII

    **If you are more of a watcher than a reader, I have the first part of this blog post in video form here. Part II can be here. **

    In this research, I feel like we can’t have a discussion about the Galactic Center and NOT bring into the equation the weird (and even dangerous) beliefs that some well-known people with GC contacts have fostered and spread far and wide (the people that I’m looking at here have had their beliefs infiltrate other areas of life outside of just their members in some form or fashion). Since the Galactic Center falls IN Sagittarius (and Sagittarius deals with notions of truth and belief, among other things), I figured I’d might find some wonky shit going on with some well known people who are well known for the “witnessing” of their beliefs. I have said several times that I don’t think the Galactic Center is universally “good” or “bad” – really, it just kind of “is.” These people, I’m thinking, used their Galactic Center connections in fucking warped ass ways (and it does seem that while the GC can be a way to expose “truth” and find “belief,” it might also have an ability to warp “truth” and “belief” as well. Could they have done something GOOD belief-wise if they had wanted too? Probably so. Did they – some seemed to do worse than others.

    I want to point out quickly the kinds of people that I was looking for:
    -Their beliefs had/have an influence on over 1000 people in some form or fashion
    -Their beliefs infiltrated other areas of life outside of JUST them and their adherents
    -These beliefs didn’t have to ONLY be spiritual/religious in nature, but any kind of belief was up for grabs (religious/spiritual/philosophical/political/etc.)
    -The last chart I looked at isn’t for a single person, but for a group with fucked beliefs

    I also want to point out that I have never said that the Galactic Center is a “good” or “bad” thing – it just kind of “is” (like the rest of the chart). I do think the Galactic Center can act as an amplifier (and can warp things) just due to all of the energy that is going on in and around it (and just by the ways that black holes function). The person in question with GC contacts gets to “choose” how they use this amplification and this warping in their own lives, just as they do with the rest of the chart. I just think this is probably pretty strong in the people who have GC contacts.

    The Charts

    Keith Raniere

    The chart above belongs to the piece of shit, Keith Raniere, who started the NXIVM cult. There is no time of birth for him on file, but that’s okay for the purposes of this exercise. Here we have Jupiter conjunct the Galactic Center, and Mars is CLOSE to the window for conjunctions that’s being looked at for the Anti-Center (but honestly, it’s a little too wide here for me to really focus on it). Uranus, Mercury, the Sun & Pluto are all trine the GC & sexile the GaC (which actually makes me think this fucker had several ways that he could’ve brought the GC truth and belief “Down to Earth” (but, obviously, probably went with one of the more fucked up possibilities of the bunch)). He doesn’t have any OOB planets, though Jupiter is the closest to being OOB (which is interesting since Jupiter goes OOB the least of all the planet). Notice though, he doesn’t have Jupiter Retrograde. And he is now in prison (which is obviously a good thing) – for 120 years lolololololol. I’ve mentioned before that I think Jupiter Rx and a conjunction to the GC can function as protective forces for the person doing their GC shit (whether that GC shit is used for the “good” or the “bad”). So I think it’s interesting that he probably won’t ever be a free man ever again.
    -While there may not have been 1000 members of the NXVIM cult, they did infiltrate other areas facets of life with their sex trafficking and other horrible bullshit.

    L. Ron Hubbard

    Lololol so this chart belong to L. Ron Hubbard, or aka: the dork who started the Church of Scientology. We have a good time of birth on file for him, so this chart is “correct” (the whole chart can be taken into account). He actually did a bunch of other shit (definitely check out his wiki which is linked to his name) – there’s too much shit there to go into in this blog post, lol, but check it out if you’re unfamiliar with him. Hubbard had his rising conjunct the Galactic Center, and the Pluto Polarity Point (that feels like it would be…..really weird…..and that seems to ring true in his case). He had natal Pluto conjunct the GaC, with his Moon in Virgo, Venus in Aries, and Saturn in Taurus trine the GC/Sextile the GaC. And what do you know? He has Jupiter Rx. This fucker was a part of several controversies (even one called the “Snow White Program” which dealt with the church trying to purge the US government’s files from any unflattering documents and records it had about the Church of Scientology….🤣🤣). He was also tried in absentia in France for fraud stemming from the church (he received a fine and 4 years imprisonment, but never did his time). Somehow this fucker got away with not ever having to really “pay” for anything that he did, and I do think him having Jupiter Rx probably plays into this (he was “protected” – as annoying as that might be to say or think).

    Joseph Smith

    This chart belongs to the founder of the Mormon Church, Joseph Smith. There is a time of birth on file for him (it’s rated C, but it’s there so we’re going with it). You know, as weird as this sounds, I’m actually inclined to believe this fucker when he said that he was given visions and told to translate/write the Book of Mormon. That doesn’t mean that I agree with the Fundamentalist Mormon thing, but I am inclined to believe that Smith DID have SOME kind of contact with SOMETHING. Not only because of his chart and having Jupiter and the Sun conjunct the Galactic Center, but because WHEN he was supposedly told to translate the visions he was given into the book of Mormon, the date was September 22, 1827. On that day, the transit Sun would’ve been conjunct the Super Galactic Center (I will get a little more into the Super GC another time, but I do think the date is important here…and the fact that this fucking date is REMEMBERED from so many years ago also strikes me as interesting). Mars in his chart was OOB. However, I do think the “angel” could’ve picked a better “translator” – Smith has no trines to the Galactic Center/sextiles to the GaC meaning I think something could’ve gotten lost in translation as he was transcribing what the angel (or whatever the fuck it was) was telling/showing him. Another thing this could show an issue with is the reception of what he was set to translate – perhaps he didn’t bring it “Down to Earth” “correctly” (there were plenty of people who took issues with his beliefs). He also doesn’t have Jupiter Retrograde, so he was lacking one of the protective elements I’ve mentioned before. He and his brother were shot to death when a pissed off group of people got a hold of them in Illinois.

    Warren Jeffs

    This chart belongs to the fuckhead Warren Jeffs who was the leader of the FLDS church (I couldn’t mention Joseph Smith and then NOT talk about this asshole). Actually, I think Jeff’s creep ass is STILL the president of the FLDS church (even though he’s currently incarcerated). There is no good time of birth on file for him, but again, that’s okay for these purposes (we just won’t be counting the major angles or the houses). He has Venus and the North Node within the window that I’m looking for conjunctions to the Galactic Center, which puts the South Node conjunct the GaC. Both Pluto and Jupiter trine the GC/sextile the GaC, giving him a couple of different avenues to bring his beliefs down to Earth (and honestly, both feel kinda fucked here). Venus is OOB in his chart (this one clearly went OOB in a gross fucking way). Oh, and look! He doesn’t have Jupiter Rx….which seems important since he didn’t get away with his bullshit and is currently serving life in prison plus 20 years.

    Kim II-Sung

    This is the chart for Kim II-Sung, the “Eternal Leader” of North Korea (running the country from 1948 to his death in 1988). He really could go on the list of politicians with Galactic Center connections that I want to do here pretty soon, but I put him on THIS list because of his philosophy/ideology of Juche (and this dictating much of how he ran North Korea). He has Jupiter Retrograde conjunct the GC (since the GC was at 25-degrees Sag when he was born, I would consider a 15-degree Jupiter as being conjunct). Pluto and Mars are conjunct the GaC, which also puts the Pluto Polarity Point (not pictured but directly opposite Pluto) right on the Galactic Center. His North Node, Sun, and Mercury Rx are trine the Galactic Center. His Mars is OOB. He does appear to have been protected via Jupiter Rx and the conjunctions to the GC because he died of a run of the mill heart attack when he was 82 (no weird circumstances surrounding his death, not assassinated, etc.).

    KKK Dickweeds

    This chart is a little different since it’s not for a specific person, but for the “start” of organization – the KKK. Since it was started by 6 different dick suckers, I decided to pull the chart for when the organization was created, which was on December 24, 1865 in Pulaski, TN. There is no time for this chart but that will be okay for this purpose (I just set the time to 12 pm). In this chart Venus, Mars, Mercury Rx, and the Sun are ALL conjunct the Galactic Center, with Uranus conjunct the GaC. Jupiter is not Rx in this chart and the klan, on the whole, has had many problems with the law throughout it’s history (rightfully so – they’re a bunch of assholes). The South Node is trine the Galactic Center (which is kind of weird, but with Mars, the planetary ruler of this South Node, conjunct the GC, I’m counting it). Mars and Uranus are OOB in this chart (both of which make contacts to the GC and GaC).

    This is one of four posts applying the same pattern to different groups: whistleblowers, whistleblowers part II, conspiracy theorists, and belief leaders (this post).

    Want the rest of the galactic stuff? Here’s everything I’ve written about the Galactic Center and the other deep space points — five-plus years of research, all in one place.

    Oh, and I do readings! If you would like for me to read your astrology chart for you, click here 🙂

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part X

    The Galactic Center from NASA’s Chandra x-ray observatory

    Back in January on the subreddit r/letsfuckwithastrology, me and Natalie put out a “call” to people to participate in a questionnaire ON the Galactic Center. When we started this questionnaire we were putting out a “call” to people who specifically have planets, Chiron, the Major Angles, and the North/South Node conjunct the GC. The orb we were looking at (and still are looking at) is 10 degrees applying to the GC and 10 degrees separating from the GC (so from roughly 16-degrees Sagittarius to 6-degrees Capricorn). So, anyone with planets that fall somewhere from 16-degrees Sagittarius to 6-degrees Capricorn were invited to participate. We ended up then adding a few questions to the bottom of the questionnaire which also included some stuff about the oppositions to the GC, though this was only intended to be answered by people who had GC conjunctions and oppositions.
    **In the people’s chart that answered the questionnaire, the GC would be 26-degrees and some odd minutes Sagittarius. Currently, just for reference, the GC is at 27-degrees and 09 minutes Sagittarius.

    This blog post is going to cover some of the findings from the research thus far – some different patterns that I’ve noticed from going over the charts of the people who participated. Now, these patterns that I have really taken notice of weren’t originally in our frame of reference when the research began. These patterns came from the different research that I’ve done on whistleblowers, truth-tellers/truth-seekers, conspiracy theorists, etc. that, since now observed, have been applied to the participants thus far with the questionnaire.
    **If anyone wants to be a part of the research and wants to answer the questionnaire (or would just like to be a part of the research but doesn’t want to fuck with the questionnaire, lol), let me know and I’ll take your information down and/or pass along the questionnaire.

    Everyone in the research has a planet conjunct the GC. While I do think the GC energy can manifest for a person even if they don’t have a planet conjunct the GC (or a planet opposite the GC), I have made it no secret that I think these people probably are MORE in-tune with the GC energy. I would definitely throw Jupiter Rx in the mix here, too. Let’s start out with talking about Jupiter Rx in the charts of these participants.

    When I was pulling these charts and doing the math, it turns out that 43% of the participants have Jupiter Rx in their natal charts. This number is actually higher than I thought it was going to be (sometimes I short change my intuitive thoughts, lol), and while not quite half, I do think it’s interesting that in a sample this size (only about 50 people that I could actually use – some people were lacking their information on the questionnaire and a chart wasn’t sent to us via email so they couldn’t be included), that it would come back with a percentage that high (and while not phenomenally high, it does seem high-ish in a sample this size). Also, taking note of Jupiter Rx in the natal charts and reading the answers of the people who participated that have Jupiter Rx in their natal chart, many of these people just seem to kind of have an understanding of the GC energy in some way (they seem to be understanding of it in some way, even if they don’t realize this is the energy that they are understanding). This wasn’t universal with everyone who has Jupiter Rx in their natal chart, but it did strike me as important with the answers that these particular people gave, that there just seemed to be, by and large, an understanding of the GC energy.
    -Taking this a step further, which I did (lol), I also wanted to include people who were born during the Jupiter Rx shadow period into this party (those born within the two weeks before Jupiter went Rx and after Jupiter went direct). I also included Jupiter out of bounds (OOB) people into the mix here. Since Jupiter goes OOB the least of any of the planets, and there is a similar energy to OOB planets and the GC, it just felt right to include Jupiter OOB people here. What I found really interesting is how many people had Jupiter OOB (there were, like, 4 or 5 people). While that isn’t a crazy high number at all, it does seem like a decent amount considering how infrequent Jupiter goes OOB. When I added all of these people into the mix, I ended up with 58% of the participants having Jupiter doing something *interesting* in their natal charts.
    -I took this another step further and also included people who have Mercury Rx in their natal charts. This makes sense to me to include. Not only because Jupiter and Mercury work hand in hand with assimilation/understanding (Jupiter) and communication/learning (Mercury), but because there is something very Galactic Anti-Center feeling about Mercury Rx. I mention that because Mercury Rx people can have difficulty being able to see the big picture – they are thrown so much noise and bullshit that isn’t really necessary for them to take into their mental headspace that they can have a difficult time putting the pieces of information together to see the big picture (or even know what pieces of information to put together in the first place). This feels similar to the GaC since this area is blinded (or that’s how it feels), and when you’re blinded you have a difficult time seeing the big picture (or even knowing what you need to take in to begin with). Also, all the space dust that surrounds the GaC – this could translate to the kind of noise that Mercury Rx takes in (while this area of space is very “calm,” there is so much bullshit in space obscuring the view). Then there are “shocks” and “lightning strikes” that I think the GaC probably takes which also seems kind of Mercury Rx in nature (especially when the Mercury Rx person starts to feel overwhelmed with everything they are taking into their mental space, when they start having difficulty making heads or tails of things). I need to flesh this particular part out a little further, but when I added in the Mercury Rx people to the percentage, I came back with 71% – so 71% of the people who participated (that I was able to include) thus far have Jupiter Rx or were born during the shadow period, Jupiter OOB, and/or Mercury Rx in their natal charts.
    **When I dive more into Mercury Rx in connection to the GaC, I will probably also look at the Mercury OOB people as well.

    Another thing that I felt inclined to look at were the OOB planets in the charts of those who participated. This is another reason why I couldn’t use everyone who participated – some people wanted to email their charts rather than giving out their information for privacy purposes (totally get it), and when we originally made this call to people with planets conjunct the GC, OOB planets weren’t really on the radar. Now they are and I also need the charts with the declination of the planets on them (this can be found on astro.com under “additional tables” after pulling your chart). I have tried to reach out to everyone, so if anyone sees this who emailed their natal chart wheel, please email the additional tables with the declinations on them as well.
    ….So back to OOB planets, I decided to take a look at how many participants have planets OOB in their chart, and I came back with 71% (again with 71% lol). The Moon goes OOB more often than any other planet, but the percentage of people who came back with the Moon OOB wasn’t as high as I figured it would be – this came in at 30%. There were a lot of people who had Uranus OOB, and while this didn’t surprise me per se (since I have mentioned the GC seems to have a Uranian quality to it), the percentage was still higher than I would’ve expected at, again, 30% (Uranus doesn’t go out of bound as often so this did stand out). Mercury and Mars OOB also seemed to be planets that came up (sometimes together in the same chart), with Mars going OOB in 20% of people, and Mercury going OOB at 13%. People with Venus OOB came in at 15%. There were no Pluto OOB people in the mix.

    Another thing I ended up looking at were the trines to the GC. This was not at all in the original questionnaire, but since looking at the charts of famous people who seem to have a “link” to the GC and the trine for them seeming to be a place where GC energy (however that personally manifests) can be “brought down to earth,” it seemed like something that needed to be looked at here. Also, keep in mind that the window for the trines that I’m looking at are any planet, Chiron, the major angles, and/or the North/South Nodes falling somewhere from 16-degrees Leo to 6-degrees Virgo and 16-Aries to 6-degrees Taurus. This opens this up considerably, so it’s no surprise that the percentage of participants that have a trine to the GC comes in pretty high at 89%. What needs to happen next in this part of the research is, perhaps, tightening the window of orb that is looked at and/or breaking people into “camps” (such as the people who have an actual planet trine the GC in one camp, and the people who have Chiron, a major angle, or the North/South Node trine the GC in another camp). I’m actually thinking the later is the way that I will go with this – breaking people into these “camps” rather than reducing the orb (for now, at least).

    Obviously, this will need to be broken down further and explored more in depth. I also want to explore Chiron connections to the GC participants thus far. As I’ve mentioned in another blog post that I do think that Chiron might play into the GC energy, and I noticed while eyeballing these charts that it did seem that in a lot of these charts there were GC/GaC connections to Chiron in some way. Chiron Rx is another thing that I noticed – it seemed that a decent amount of the participants also had Chiron Rx. I will need to do the percentages on all of this, though (forgive me, lol, it’s a lot of different patterns to try to figure out at once so I have to break them down and break them apart a little at a time). I also noticed that several of people that took part in the study seemed to be what I would call “retrograde heavy” in their own charts (either because their chart ruler was Rx, they had 3 or more planets Rx in their chart, or the planet that was conjunct the GC (or opposite the GC) was Rx). Again though, I would need to crunch the numbers on this to see if it is actually as significant as I think it might be. Retrograde energy in general just feels very GC in nature to me, especially since all retrograde planets are going to point to Uranus in some way (and I’ve mentioned that the GC feels very Uranian in nature).

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part IX or: The Fucking Lightning Rod

    Galactic Center Thoughts part IX or: The Fucking Lightning Rod

    Definition of a Lightning Rod (or Lightning Attractor) – “A metal rod or wire fixed to an exposed part of a building or other tall structure to divert lightning harmlessly into the ground.“

    I wanna talk about lightning rods for just a second (and I promise this will go somewhere, lol, bear with me). A lightning rod is a protective thing keeps buildings and other structures from being decimated by lightning strikes. Another definition of a lightning rod is “a person or thing that attracts a lot of criticism, especially in order to divert attention from more serious issues or to allow a more important public figure to appear blameless.” In terms of a natal chart, I might tailor this definition just a little bit: |

    “a place in the natal chart that takes the impact from a surge (or even overflow) of energy from another place in the chart.”

    Where the fuck am I going with this? The Galactic Center/Galactic Anti-Center Axis, with the Galactic Anti-Center playing the role of the lightning rod.
    **As an aside – I told myself on the day that I actually started drafting this blog post (July 4, 2021) that if the sky started with it’s lightning and thunder and shit that I was *probably* on some kind of semblance of the right track. And what the fuck do ya know? LIGHTNING! Fire in the sky ^_^**

    In the last blog post about Out of Bounds Planets and their possible connection to the Galactic Center (since OOB planets feel like they have a similar energy to the GC), I mentioned a quote from Julian Assange that I am going to re-mention here because it REALLY got me thinking A LOT about the GC, and specifically the Galactic Anti-Center aka GaC (these next two “paragraphs” (the quote and the paragraph of text after it) are taken from my last blog post verbatim. This quote comes from a 2010 interview for Anorak News that he gave talking about WikiLeaks and his role in it):

    “We always expect tremendous criticism. It is my role to be the lightning rod….to attract the attacks against the organization for our work, and that is a difficult role. On the other hand, I get undue credit.”

    The notion of him being a “lightning rod” is interesting here – or rather the notion of the area opposite the GC (the area that composes the GaC) being a hypothetical “lightning rod” of sorts. The area opposite the GC being one that is struck and charged by the GC, but by way of taking the hit from the GC (perhaps, so everything around the GC, planets there or not, isn’t completely decimated). It kind of gives another flavor to how I’ve talked about the GaC being an area where we are “blinded” due to the bright ass star that is close to the GaC in space. Maybe it’s not just the blinding from that star – maybe the area across from the GC is also the area where the “lightning” from the GC strikes – and lightning is bright as fuck, too. Without a planet conjunct the GC, though, and just a planet opposite the GC (planet conjunct the GaC), there is nothing conjunct the GC to kind of “absorb” some of the charge – meaning the fucking lightning striking a planet conjunct the GaC (without a planet conjunct the GC, too) feels like it would be massive.

    When I read that quote above (and this sounds fucking stupid lol) but it was almost like lightning stuck me and I fucking UNDERSTOOD HOW the Galactic Anti-Center functions (or…errrr….how I THINK it MIGHT function). I realize that Assange wasn’t talking AT ALL about the GaC when he made that comment (he was talking about himself being like a lightning rod for WikiLeaks), but looking at his chart and his own connections to the GC (he has Venus conjunct the GaC), I started making this lightning rod connection with the GaC …. and goddamn – feels like it fits. Here is a picture of his chart again so you can have a visual of what I’m talking about:

    As you can see, he has nothing conjunct the GC, but he does have Venus opposite the GC/Venus conjunct the GaC. Here, the GaC and Venus function as the “lightning rod” for all of the energy of the GC. Regardless if someone has a planet conjunct the GC or not, the GC is STILL a player in the person’s chart (there is just such a massive amount of energy and charge around the GC, it feels like it matters in the chart regardless of if there is a planet conjunct the GC or not), which also makes the GaC a player in the chart, too. In his particular case, with nothing conjunct the GC to kind of transmute or absorb some of the energy from the GC, the energy absolutely has to “strike” somewhere else. This, I think, is where the GaC comes into play. This part of the actual sky is much more calm than the GC, which already makes it a perfect sort of place to get struck by this hypothetical lightning. Yes, it’s surrounded by space dust and it’s near a very bright and blinding star in space, but things are “calm” there …. which makes it seem that it would be even more “vulnerable” to the notion of it being a lightning rod in the first place. He also doesn’t have a planet or tangible body in the sky sextile the GaC or trine the GC. You know how I’ve mentioned before that the area sextile the GaC and trine the GC (from roughly 16-degrees Leo to 6-degrees Virgo and 16-degrees Aries to 6-degrees Taurus) is where the GC stuff can be brought “down to Earth.” Yeah, that makes even more sense in this context, especially since lightning rods have to be GROUNDED to the Earth. The grounding for the lightning rod in this case is the sextile to the GaC and the trine to the GC. Astrologically, it feels like Assange was left “wide open.” Yes, he has his Midheaven sextile the GaC, but this isn’t a tangible body in the sky (and the Sun, the planetary ruler of his Midheaven, does fuck all regarding the GC/GaC Axis).

    I really do think that the area around the GaC is the lightning rod (or something LIKE a lightning rod) for all the energy that the GC can’t “take” (for whatever reason). This also kind of goes along with the idea that I’ve mentioned in some videos and some of my other blog posts that the GC is “protected” (along with any planets conjunct the GC being “protected” as well). The GC DEFINITELY transforms/mutates/changes/charges the planets that are conjunct it, but it doesn’t destroy them (energy can’t be “destroyed” anyway). Because there is SO MUCH energy going on at the GC, it seems like there would be an overflow OF energy, regardless if you had planets conjunct the GC or not (though, I’m thinking right now, the overflow of energy would probably be greater for people who have no conjunctions to the GC but have a planet or something major conjunct the GaC, since in this case the area around the GaC AND the planet would function as the lightning rod). Just to be clear, though, I think the GaC will function like a lightning rod regardless if there is a planet conjunct it or not (this notion of a lightning rod just seems amplified if there is a planet conjunct the GaC).

    Let’s talk for a second about people that have NO planets conjunct the GC or the GaC – how might this axis function? Regardless if you have planets conjunct these places in the chart or not, you still have the GC in your chart which emits a shit ton of energy in the house which it falls. This might mean that there is a lot of “energy” in the house that the GC falls (and this energy might be kind of “weird”), or the way that you relate to the areas of life that this house deals with might be kind of “charged,” or “weird”. The overflow from this “charge” then strikes the area conjunct the GaC and completely rocks it’s quiet little part of space. Not only is one *maybe* kind of blinded or unclear about the areas of life where the GaC falls, but it is also left vulnerable to this energy surge from the GC (and is completely NOT expecting this). Where the GaC falls by house, you might find that the houses “areas of life” are susceptible to shocks and “upsets” that seem to take it by surprise. The GaC still feels like it would function as this hypothetical lightning rod even if there isn’t anything conjunct the GC or the GaC. This may or may not be as noticeable for people who have no planets conjunct either the GC or the GaC – I’m on the fence about how much it would be felt if you didn’t have any planets or anything major along the GC/GaC axis. I’m thinking, though, that something would still have to be felt SOMETIMES (even if not all the time). I would also venture to bet that people who have no planets conjunct the GC or GaC, but have the “grounding” needed (a planet trine the GC/sextile the GaC), might feel the energy from the GC/GaC axis more and might even have an easier time grounding the energy/doing something with it.

    Lets say you have someone who has planets conjunct the GC, but no planet conjunct the GaC…how would this function? So in this case, hypothetically, you would have the planet conjunct the GC “absorbing” a lot of the GC energy (lighting it the fuck up). It still probably wouldn’t absorb ALL the energy, though, and in comes the lightning strikes to the GaC. Even without a planet conjunct the GaC, the GaC is still an attractor for these lightning strikes, meaning the house where the GaC falls will take the impact. It does seem like without an actual planet as the attractor, the entire house where the GaC falls would take the impact. How exactly does this translate? I could see there being issues in a lot of the areas of life in the house where the GaC falls. With no planet or other major planetary body to take the hit of the lightning strike, I could see this leaving the person not really knowing WHAT to do about the shock (or hell, they might not even be aware as much about how MUCH these areas of their life actually take “hits” to begin with). What probably helps the translation of this is having the “grounding” sextile to the GaC/trine to the GC (and planet conjunct the GC), though these people might not be as clear that there is anything they need to “ground” in the first place (which seems like it *could* cause a whole host of issues). While that planet (and area) conjunct the GC might be protected, they are left wide open where the GaC is found in the chart.

    Then there are people who have BOTH conjunctions to the GC and conjunctions to the GaC. In this case, you have the planet conjunct the GC “absorbing” the GC energy (and “protected”), but again, there is so much energy with the GC that the lightning will strike somewhere else. In comes the planet conjunct the GaC to function as a clear attractor for the energy surge. While the planet conjunct the GC might be protected, that planet conjunct the GaC feels like it would take a massive fucking hit (meaning, for people who have something like this going on in their charts, the planet conjunct the GaC may function as sort of Achilles Heel of the chart). This is kind of where the feeling of polarity comes into play, too – the planet and area of life where the GC falls may be more understood by the person (even if it isn’t “easy,” it is understood), whereas the planet opposite the GC gets constantly fucked up the ass (and that planet and area of life may leave the person constantly feeling dumbfounded or “stupid” about what’s going on there). This feels like it would be made incredibly difficult if the person is lacking the trine to the GC/sextile to the GaC to ground the lightning strikes down to Earth. Not that it’s that much easier for the person with the trine to the GC/sextile to the GaC, but at least when the person has these, they have a way to ground the shocks to the GaC.

    Will be looking into this even more…..stay tuned.

    More of a watcher than a reader? Incoming video about this same topic!

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part VIII

    Galactic Center Thoughts part VIII

    Here is the video I made about the Galactic Center in the 1st through 6th Houses, for all of you that are interested (and watchers rather than readers). Here is the video for the Galactic Center in the 7th through 12th Houses.

    I wanted to type something up about some thoughts on the GC in the different houses – taking the conjunctions to the GC and everything else that has been the focus of the research off of the table for just a second. Regardless if someone has conjunctions to the GC, Jupiter RX, conjunctions to the Galactic Anti-Center, and/or trines to the GC (or some other things that I’ve mentioned), the GC still feels like it would be important in the chart. Since the Earth orbits the Sun, and the Sun orbits the GC, it seems fundamental to the chart, regardless of if the planets in your chart make any of the GC contacts I’ve gone on about in other blog posts and videos or not. . How might the GC/GaC axis function in your own chart just taking the houses into account? Let’s take a look at some possibilities, keeping the below in mind as you read:


    **Keep in mind that these are more general ideas and you would want to take the whole chart into account. These will probably need to be tailored some for the particular chart that you are looking at. Just use these to get your own creativity going for ideas and for synthesis.


    **Keep the notion of the GC being a massive charge of energy in mind when thinking about the house where the GC falls. My theory is that the house where the GC falls in the chart, in some way, probably feels energetically charged. Is this conscious or not, “easy” or “challenging,” etc.? That would depend on the whole chart in question. You could also end up with someone who feels that the energy is sucked from the house where the GC falls, too (I could totally see that happening in some cases).


    **Keep the notion of the GaC being a blinding (or blinded) force, one where maybe we can’t see the areas of life by the House the GaC falls in “correctly” due to this blinding, or clearly due to all the space dust going clouding things (there is a lot of space dust and bullshit around the GaC in space). It also seems possible that there could be some issues in this house’s areas of life but the person may “pretend” (either on purpose or not) that everything is fine. Also keep in mind that the GaC may take an overflow (or something like it) of the energy from the GC in the chart, which might “shock” and “upset” this area of life (though this probably allows the person to see these areas of life more clearly when the “shocks” occur). DO they actually choose to keep seeing them clearly? That’s a whole other discussion, lol.


    **You would also want to take note of where Jupiter is in the chart (regardless of if it is retrograde or direct). Where Jupiter falls in the chart (by sign, house, and aspects) will give one a better idea of HOW much the person might be aware of the GC energy in their life and what other area of life the GC will bestow it’s power to (since Jupiter is the planetary ruler of Sagittarius, which is where the GC falls).


    **If you happen to be someone who has the GC on the boundary of a house cusp, you could read the GC as if it was in BOTH houses (though I probably wouldn’t do this unless the GC was on the house cusp involving a major angle – the 1st House, the 4th House, the 7th House, or the 10th House).

    **I have never once said the GC is universally good or bad, or easy or challenging. Keep that in mind, too.

    **The First House/ Seventh House Axis**

    Galactic Center in the 1st House might cause someone to be personally connected with the GC (they may not realize this, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some kind of amplified sense of being connected to the GC, or at least an “understanding” of the energy of the GC). The person might be kind of weird or unorthodox (or have a weird/unorthodox approach to themselves, the way they present themselves, their physical body, and other 1st House “areas of life”). This person feels like their sense of who they are would just have a shit ton of energy behind it. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 7th House. This person may feel a sense of “blinding” or some lack of clarity in the areas of life dealing with one-on-one close relationships (of any variety). There might be even be “shocks” or “upsets” that seem to hit them out of the blue, out of nowhere in these area’s of life, too. Depending on how close the GaC is to the Descendant, you might also have the person be kind of blinded, un-clear, or even “shocked” by the shadow side of themselves.

    Galactic Center in the 7th House might cause someone to have one-on-one relationships (of any variety) that seem to be GC charged in some way. The relationships might be a little different or weird, and they may attract this into their lives (whether they like it or not). They might also have an interesting relationship with the shadow side of themselves if the GC is close to the Descendant (they might be strangely familiar with the shadow side’s energy, even if they try to ignore or deny this). There is probably a lot of energy surrounding this area of their life in some way. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 1st House. This person may feel that they are personally blinded by things about themselves (perhaps due to all the energy of the GC focused on the house that deals with close relationships), or even just being generally not as clear about who they are and how they react naturally to the world around them (but there will probably be things that come to pass that kind of “shock” them into knowing who they are).

    **The Second House/Eighth House Axis**

    Galactic Center in the 2nd House might cause someone to have a “different” or “charged” relationship with their money and with their resources. They might have the same kind of relationship with their concepts of self-esteem, self-value, and perhaps even the things that they value are a little more unorthodox in nature. There is probably energy is that is put towards this houses areas of life, and the person may or may not do this on purpose. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 8th House. This person may feel a sense of “blinding” or some lack of clarity surrounding the values and resources of other people, or even things regarding sex and sexuality, psychological processes, and the deep soul merging that happens between two people. Since the 8th House is also like the bridge between the deeply conscious 4th House and the unconscious 12th House, it could be that there might be a real blinding to things that go IN the place between the conscious and the unconscious.

    Galactic Center in the 8th House might cause someone to have a “different” or “charged” relationship with the place between the conscious and unconscious parts of them. The same could also be said about psychological processes, sex/sexuality, other people’s resources and values, and the deep soul merging that happens between two people. There is probably a shit ton of energy there, but since we’re talking about the 8th House, this does feel like one of the more difficult places to be able to access the GC energy to one’s benefit. Where Jupiter falls in this person’s chart will probably be very important for them to access it “out-loud” (depending on where Jupiter falls and what it’s doing, obviously). This puts the Galactic Anti-Center in the 2nd House. This person may feel a sense of blinding or lack of clarity about their own self worth (this seems like it’s probably the biggest deal here, to be honest). There might also be issues with their resources, their money, and even knowing what they really value. There will probably be shocks that happen in life to force them to see these things more clearly.

    **The Third House/Ninth House Axis**

    Galactic Center in the 3rd House might cause someone to have an unorthodox and/or charged relationship with the way that they communicate, the way that they learn, and the way that take in information. They are probably aware (at at least a little bit) to there being some differences in these areas between themselves and other people. Their perception of things might also be a little different than the general population. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 9th House. This person may feel kind of blinded to the understanding of the bigger picture on a macro level, and they might even feel rather blinded by their belief and the way that they seek their personal truth (or there might be something “blinding” about these things). There could even be some shocks and upsets that happen in these areas, kind of forcing these people to question their truth (and other 9th House notions) often.

    Galactic Center in the 9th House might cause someone to have a strange or charged relationship to the way that they see the big picture, and with the way that they understand and assimilate things. They could also have an interesting relationship with religion and metaphysics, higher education, and with how they believe in things and seek truth. It feels like there would be a bunch of energy surrounding these notions. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 3rd House. This person might feel kind of blinded about the micro level (seeing things in a “smaller” context), and there could even be something blinding or unclear about how they perceive things in life. “Regular” (lol, whatever that is) communication may not be the easiest thing for these people to do. There will probably be shocks that happen in this person’s life that kind of force them to see what they aren’t seeing in these areas of life.

    **The Fourth House/Tenth House Axis**

    Galactic Center in the 4th House might cause someone to have a different or charged relationship with the concept of who they are at their core (and this is probably amplified if the GC is conjunct the IC). There might be a whole bunch of energy surrounding notions of home or family (though depending on the rest of the chart, this might be “easy” or “challenging”). I would think that like those with the GC in the 1st House, people with the GC in the 4th are also very aware and in-tune with the GC energy (though unlike the 1st House GC person, the 4th House GC person may be more private about this). This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 10th House. This person might feel a blinding or lack of clarity when it comes to their professional/public life – such as things having to do with their career, their public presence, their reputation, and their social status. They probably go through shocks during their lives that try to make them aware of 10th House areas of life in a more clear way.

    The Galactic Center in the 10th House might cause someone to have a weird or charged relationship with the concept of who they are in the public spheres of life (and this is probably amplified if the GC is conjunct the MC). There is probably a whole bunch of energy surrounding things dealing with career, public presence, and reputation (though it really would depend on the whole chart as to if this is “easy” or “challenging”). The public could be more aware of the GC energy in these people than the person is aware of it (or I could see that happening here). This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 4th House. This person might be rather blinded or unclear about things regarding the core of themselves, and even things dealing with notions of family and home (what these actually mean to the person). They probably go through some shocks during their lives that beg them to see the 4th House in a clearer way.

    –Along this axis, I also want to mention that there could be *something* going on with the concept of a person’s parents. I feel like you can see the parents of the person in BOTH the 4th & 10th Houses, not necessarily assigning one house for one parent and the other house for the other parent. This may not be the case across the board – if you have the GC in the 4th or 10th House, your parents may not be involved at all, but I certainly wouldn’t rule it out as a possibility.

    **The Fifth House/Eleventh House Axis**

    The Galactic Center in the 5th House might cause someone to have a charged relationship with creatively being able to express themselves. There might also be a charge or weirdness to things like risk taking, to the hobbies that you have, and even to the way that you “play” and have fun. If you have any children, the relationship with your children may be a little different as well. There just feels like there would be a lot of energy (created or spent) in these areas of life. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 11th House. This might cause there to be a blinding or a lack of clarity about how to express yourself in groups of people and with your friends. There could also be a blinding when it comes to what long-term goals you should be going after (or what your long-term goals are in the first place). My guess is that there would be shocks or upsets that happen in the areas of life which this house deals that kind of make the person aware of what they aren’t seeing clearly.

    The Galactic Center in the 11th House might cause someone to have a charged relationship with how they handle themselves in social situations, with friends, and in terms of social causes. A lot of energy probably goes into the above, along with long-term goals. The person might have the ability to really make an impact in a big way regarding other people. This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 5th House. There might be some blinding about how the person can creatively express themselves independent of groups, friends, and social causes. It could also make it unclear what this person actually enjoys doing for hobbies and how they “play.” The relationship with their children may also be a little blinded or unclear in some way. There would probably be shocks that happen in the 5th House areas of life to kind of wake the person up to what isn’t being seen clearly in this house.

    **The Sixth House/Twelfth House Axis**

    The Galactic Center in the 6th House might cause someone to have different or charged relationship with their health (either/or physical & mental health) – really health is the first thing that comes to mind here. I would also think that this same charge exists with daily life and routine in general, along with the work that they do and the way that they “serve.” This would put the Galactic Anti-Center in the 12th House. I might think that with the GaC in this house, the person might be even more blinded to/by their unconscious, or it just might be even less clear than it usually is. They might not see the ways that they escape or the ways that they imprison themselves in the unconscious. There are probably shocks that occur that, at least briefly, to jolt some of this shit closer to a conscious viewpoint. They should grab these opportunities when they happen and run with them.

    The Galactic Center in the 12th House might cause someone to have the unconscious parts of them highly fucking charged. Do they feel this clearly – probably not (this one, like having the GC in the 8th House, feels like it would be difficult). The person might have a strange relationship with notions of escape and “imprisonment,” but I might also think that they have a much stronger psychic-like charge than they realize (and this should be trusted if it isn’t). This puts the Galactic Anti-Center in the 6th House. This person may have some blinding or lack of clarity to the way that they need to actually function in the real, physical world. They may not see things like routine, service, and even the work that they do (or should do) clearly enough. There might be shocks that happen to them in their daily life that beg them to see these areas a little more clearly.

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part VII

    **Here is a video of this same stuff if you are more of a watcher than a reader**

    In some of the videos that I’ve made about the Galactic Center, and even in some of the blog posts I’ve done about the GC, I have made comments about the GC having a similar feeling that Out of Bounds (OOB) planets have. OOB Planets have a Uranian flavor to them, probably due to the nature of the OOB planet not being under the domain of the Sun anymore (the orbit of the OOB planet is beyond that of Earth’s orbit with the Sun). This makes the planet function in a more wild, unusual, or unpredictable manner – and really, with OOB planets, you can end up with the genius, with the renegade, with the unorthodox, and even sheer madness. The way the OOB planet will “go” isn’t as “set” as planets that aren’t OOB – sometimes it kind of feels like a coin toss. The chart itself will probably give clues as to HOW this planet ends up functioning, but even then the OOB planet can be kind of a wild card. There is also a sense about the planets that fall OOB and not “knowing any bounds.” Planets that are OOB don’t tend to let things limit them- a planet in bounds knows what it’s limits are and typically sticks to those. OOB planets, on the other hand, don’t stick to any limits that are “imposed” on them. It’s this notion of not “doing” the limit thing, and of the “changing” of the way the planet functions, that feels very GC-ish to me. The Galactic Center definitely seems to “change” planets that it comes in contact with (specifically the conjunctions and the oppositions). IF the GC is actually the source of all creation, a lifeline to other dimensions (and maybe even to aliens and shit ^_^), then the Galactic Center is limitless in a similar kind of way to OOB planets. The GC feels like it knows no limits – we don’t even KNOW where that mother fucker goes on the other side (that in and of itself feels pretty fucking limitless). I mean, really take a minute and THINK about that. WE DON’T KNOW WHERE THIS MOTHER FUCKER ENDS OR WHAT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE! Am I the only one who gets a fucking thought boner about that? I can’t be, right?

    I have a couple of blog posts here and here that go into more detail about the logistics of OOB planets (I’m not gunna do that in this post), but I will say that a planet that is considered OOB when it is beyond 23-degrees 26-minutes North and 23-degrees 26-minutes South in declination.

    This is an example from Edward Snowden’s chart from the additional tables on astro.com. The declination portion of the table is circled, as is Mars since it’s OOB.

    The people who DO have Out of Bounds planets and Galactic Center contacts

    In the research that I’ve looked into so far dealing with famous whistleblowers, truth-tellers, and even conspiracy theorists, I have talked about several things in relations to their charts and the Galactic Center, but I hadn’t (until now) looked to see what, if any, planets happen to be OOB in their charts. I’m glad I did because there does seem to be a correlation. Thus far I have looked at 14 people in the blog posts and/or videos, and out of the 14 that I’ve looked at, 10 of the people have OOB planets in their chart (this would come in at 71% of people I’ve looked at so far). Here are the people that DO have OOB planets and what planets they are:
    **Edward Snowden – Mars OOB (Mars is conjunct the GaC)
    **Chelsea Manning – Mercury and Uranus OOB (both are conjunct the GC)
    **Jeffrey Wigand – Mercury and Venus OOB (both are loosely conjunct the GC)
    **Erin Brockovich – Venus OOB (conjunct the GaC)
    **Karen Silkwood – Mars and Pluto OOB (neither conjunct the GC or GaC)
    **Bill Cooper – Venus and Pluto OOB (Venus is conjunct the GaC)
    **Donald Trump – Mercury & Pluto OOB (neither is TECHNICALLY in the window of orb that I’m looking at for conjunctions to the GC and the GaC, but fuck me, Mercury’s close to that window)
    **Mark Whitacre (mentioned in a video) – Mars OOB (Mars conjunct the GaC)
    **Colleen Rowley (mentioned in a video) – Mercury OOB (Mercury conjunct the GC)
    **Alexander Litvinenko (mentioned in a video) – Mercury OOB (loosely conjunct the GC using the December 4, 1962 DOB)//Mars OOB (loosely conjunct the GaC using the August 30, 1962 DOB). There are some questions on which date he was actually born.

    As you can can see, a majority of the people actually have the planet that is OOB fucking (conjunct) the Galactic Center or the Galactic Anti-Center. I don’t think that it has to be this way for the OOB planet to matter (I think OOB planets matter to the GC whether they are fucking the GC (or the GaC) or not just because the energy between OOB planets and the Galactic Center feel so similar), but I do think it’s interesting that a lot of these people have their OOB planet (or planets) fucking the GC or the GaC.

    The people who do not

    What I also find really interesting are the people that DON’T have OOB planets in their charts and the connections that these people’s charts have to the GC/GaC axis in the first place.

    1. Julian Assange has no planets OOB in his chart. I think this is interesting because he was one of the only people that I looked at that did NOT have ANYTHING conjunct the GC. He has Venus opposite the GC (conjunct the GaC) – so while he does have a GC contact via the opposition, he doesn’t have something fucking the GC. Assange himself made an interesting comment about his own role in Wikileaks (and even, life in general, maybe?) back in 2010 to Anorak News:

      “We always expect tremendous criticism. It is my role to be the lightning rod….to attract the attacks against the organization for our work, and that is a difficult role. On the other hand, I get undue credit.”

      The notion of him being a “lightning rod” is interesting here – or rather the notion of the area opposite the GC (the area that composes the GaC) being a hypothetical “lightning rod” of sorts. The area opposite the GC being one that is struck and charged by the GC, but by way of taking the hit from the GC (perhaps, so everything around the Galactic Center, planets there or not, isn’t completely decimated. It kind of gives another flavor to how I’ve talked about the GaC being an area where we are “blinded” due to the bright ass star that is close to the GaC in space. Maybe it’s not just the blinding from that star – maybe the area across from the GC is also the area where the “lightning” from the GC strikes – and lightning is bright as fuck, too. Without a planet conjunct the GC, though, and just a planet opposite the GC (planet conjunct the GaC), there is nothing conjunct the GC to kind of “absorb” some of the charge – meaning the fucking lightning striking a planet conjunct the GaC (without a planet conjunct the GC, too) feels like it would be massive.

    2. Alex Jones and Gary Webb are two people who also have no OOB planets in their chart. I mention them together because they both have the North Node conjunct the Galactic Center (Jones ONLY has the North Node conjunct the GC, and Webb has the North Node and Ascendant conjunct the GC). Now, in both cases, we aren’t talking about a tangible body in the sky being conjunct the GC (the North Node is a hypothetical point and the Ascendant is a Cardinal Point/Major Angle/Personal Sensitive Point/whatever term you prefer). The North Node is also something that we don’t come into this world “understanding” or “comfortable” with – our mission is to move into it and understand it (so I think it’s interesting that these two have no OOB planets for this reason). They both have oppositions to the GC (Jones has Saturn and the South Node conjunct the GaC and Webb has the Descendant and South Node conjunct the GaC). This also gives them this “lightning rod” quality – and they both have been lightning rods in different ways (Webb with his writings about the CIA’s involvement with the drug trade to fund the Contras and Jones, well lol, doing what Jones does best).

    3. Frank Serpico is the last of the people that doesn’t have any OOB planets, and his is the one that throws me the most. Now he does HAVE all the other things that I’ve been focusing on in the research – he has a conjunction to the Galactic Center (Jupiter), he has Jupiter RX in his natal chart, and he has a trine from the Galactic Center to the Sun, Mercury, and Uranus. I was actually kind of surprised that he didn’t have anything OOB considering all the others who DO have conjunctions to the GC seem have OOB planets (this far in the research on these well known people, anyway). Why might this be the case? Well, one thing that I notice is that his North Node is at 6-degrees (or 7-degrees) Capricorn – I mention both degrees since I’ve seen it as both. THIS is a little wide to be considered conjunct the GC, but if the North Node IS at 6-degrees, it would be within the window of orb that I’m looking at for conjunctions (even if wide, it’s there). This would make him more inclined to have been comfortable coming into this world with the energy of the GaC per the loose South Node conjunction, needing to move towards his North Node (though having the push from Jupiter RX to help this happen). I wonder, if like in the case of Jones and Webb, he just wasn’t as acquainted with the Galactic Center energy when he made his debut in this lifetime. I do think that this is an interesting correlation, though.

    The nodal axis connection

    The Nodes of the Moon can play into having OOB planets – the closer that the North Node is to 0-degrees Aries (and the South Node is to 0-Libra) in a chart, the higher a chance that the person has of having OOB planets. Since my North Node is at 0-Aries, this would probably help to explain why I have 3 OOB planets in my own chart – the Moon, Venus, and Uranus. On the flip side of that, the closer that the North Node is to 0-Libra (and the South Node is to 0-Aries), the less of a chance the person has of having OOB planets. It doesn’t HAVE to go this way, though – not as common, but there are people with their North Node closer to 0-Aries that don’t have any planets OOB and people with their North Node closer to 0-Libra that might have a couple OOB planets. This doesn’t really help to explain the situations with Jones, Webb, and specifically Serpico, since their Nodal Axis is in Gemini/Sagittarius or Cancer/Capricorn.

    I will have to flesh this out even further – but there does seem to be some correlation between the GC and OOB planets people (all 10 of the other people have OOB planets). There also just feels to me that there is a correlation between the Galactic Center and OOB energy in general.

    ……and lightning rods. Fuck, now I have lightning rods on my mind.
    I went further into this ^^^ in part IX

    Want the rest of the galactic stuff? Here’s everything I’ve written about the Galactic Center and the other deep space points — five-plus years of research, all in one place.

    Oh! And if you would like an astrology reading from me, you can get one here 🙂

  • Some thoughts on how to bring the Galactic Center shit “down to Earth.”

    Some thoughts on how to bring the Galactic Center shit “down to Earth.”

    Just as a disclaimer – this is literally JUST an idea, I’m just fucking around with this shit and am in no way, shape, or form claiming that this is “correct,” or that I am any kind of expert in this particular area of astrology (I won’t do myself dirty/sell myself completely short though – I have a lot of astrological knowledge in MANY areas of astrology, but this particular are, the Galactic Center (GC), is more of a “mystery” to me). I also reserve the right to to find this wrong later on…so, in other words, no one hold me to this shit 🤪Without playing around with ideas and theories and stuff like that, we wouldn’t ever learn anything new.

    In the intro article that I wrote about the Galactic Center (GC), I mentioned the idea of bringing stuff FROM the GC “down to Earth.” In case I didn’t make it clear WHY this would be necessary in the first place (sometimes I’m not as clear as I would like to be 🤣), there is an idea that the GC is the source of all creation, and a life-line to the “other side” (or other realms, other dimensions, etc.). There is also an idea that the GC is a way to tap into this source of all creation, to tap into other dimensions, and even to be FED information from the source of all creation and/or from other dimensions. Why would this need to be brought “down to Earth?” Because the GC, I would think, could feed people some really weird shit that may not make a whole bunch of sense, and almost needs to be translated into our language here on Earth (the GC seems like it speaks a language all its own). EVERYBODY has the GC in their natal chart, meaning EVERYBODY has this potential in their chart. I won’t lie, though – the propensity to be really connected to the GC does seem like this would be the strongest with people who have planets conjunct the GC (and probably even planets opposite the GC, albeit in a different way). Currently, the GC is at 27-degrees 3-minutes Sagittarius (or 27 Sagittarius 03), but it moves VERY SLOWLY like a fixed star (it’s not a fixed star, but it moves LIKE one), meaning you will need to pull the GC in your own chart to know exactly where it was when you born.

    In the intro to the Galactic Center article, I mentioned that there is the Galactic Center (GC), and then there is the Galactic Anti-Center (GaC) which is opposite the GC (right now the GaC is at 27 Gemini 03). I also mentioned that scientifically the Earth is 2/3 of the way from the GC, and 1/3 of the way from the GaC (this may or may not be a rough or crude estimation) – Earth is definitely closer to the GaC than the GC. In knowing ALL of this, in regards to this theory I’m playing with, we’d be looking for the place in the chart where the 2/3 and 1/3 point meet.

    There are 360-degrees in a natal chart. Having the GC and GaC opposing each other, we are looking at two different sections of the chart with 180°. Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

    So, we might theoretically be looking at two spots where the GC information could be brought down to Earth since we’d be looking at one point on the lower half of the chart and another point on the upper part of the chart. In doing the math here, 180 divided by 2/3 you get 120 and 180 divided by 1/3 you get 60. This would put this theoretical point where you could bring information down to earth 60-degrees from the GaC and 120-degrees from the GC on either part of the chart. Since the GC is currently at 27 Sagittarius 03, this would make these points 27 Aries 03 and 27 Leo 03 right now (and from the windows of degrees from 17 Aries 03 to 07 Taurus 03 and 17 Leo 03 to 07 Virgo 03. For example, in my natal chart the GC was at 26 Sagittarius 41 when I was born, so this would make the precise location of the points in my chart 26 Aries 41 (in the 4th House) and 26 Leo 41 (in my 9th House), and would make these windows from 16 Aries 41 to 06 Taurus 41 and 16 Leo 41 to 06 Virgo 41. You would need to see where the GC was when you were born to find the precise location for this in your own chart.

    What I think might be really important here is if one has planets conjunct this particular degree, or within a certain window of degrees, to be able to bring the stuff one gets fed from the Galactic Center down to Earth. I would use a wider orb here – maybe something like 10-degrees on either side….or that’s what I’m starting out with regarding this theory (casting a wide net like with the initial GC research on reddit). This would put this window from 16 Aries 41 to 6 Taurus 41 and from 16 Leo 41 to 6 Virgo 41 based on my own chart – depending on where exactly the GC was when you were born this might be a little different “minutes” wise.

    These windows of degrees in the chart seem, at the moment, where all the shit from the Galactic Center could be translated down to Earth. If one has conjunctions to the GC, but no planet (or the Sun/Moon Midpoint, Chiron, cardinal points, etc.) within that window of degree, they might be given a ton of information from the GC but never be able to translate or transmute that information down to Earth in a way that makes sense to them or anyone else. Luckily, there are two windows of degree for this (as of now I’m rolling with this, anyway), meaning it seems like there would be a better chance that something in the chart would fall within those windows.

    This also brings the question of planets trine the Galactic Center to the forefront of my mind (since these windows of degree are essentially trine the GC). It probably plays in and plays out the strongest when looking at someone who has planets conjunct the GC (maybe even opposing the GC), and something trine it to bring that information down to Earth. The people that just have the trines to the GC but no conjunctions – they are able to translate (or transmute) the GC energy down to earth more easily, maybe, but they might not be as familiar with where that energy comes from if they don’t have a planet conjunct the GC as well (meaning they may not really know what they are able to translate in the first place). It does seem like a planet (or whatever) falling within these windows of degrees could serve as a filter for bringing the stuff the GC feeds someone down to Earth – it could be used as a vehicle this way. The closer the planet (or whatever) is to the actual exact points, 60-degrees on either side of the GaC and 120 degrees from the GC, the better this planet serves as vehicle for bringing shit down to Earth.

    Definitely play around with this and I’d love to hear any thoughts that anyone has. I will probably make a video about this over the weekend and link it to this post, lol.

    To find the Galactic Center in your own chart, go to astro.com and under the fixed star list (once you’ve picked the extended chart selection at the top, you will go the to the bottom where it says “additional objects” after entering your information). Go down to the G’s and pick the option that says “Gal. Center, SgrA*.” Then run the chart 🙂

    Here is YouTube video that kind of goes along with all of the above ^_^ and if you would like for me to read for you, you can book a reading with me here 🙂

    Want the rest of the galactic stuff? Here’s everything I’ve written about the Galactic Center and the other deep space points — five-plus years of research, all in one place.