Category: Deep Space

  • Some Thoughts on 3I/ATLAS

    Some Thoughts on 3I/ATLAS

    Disclaimer: This post is probably going to be ALL over the place (and here is a link to the video that accompanies it). Bear with me. Like everyone and their mother (hahahaha), I have also had my eye on 3I/ATLAS. Until now I haven’t wanted to write about it because, honestly, I’m not even sure wtf to say about it in a way that makes any (linear) sense. But! Because of my focus on galactic astrology and all of the research I’ve done over the years, and because people have been asking my opinion on Atlas, I kind of feel like I CAN’T NOT write something or speak about this interstellar object (or whatever the hell it is). So….here we are 🤣 and I’m going to try and make this make SOME kind of translatable sense about this interstellar object (and if you would like for me to make sense of your chart for you – which I KNOW I can do – you can get an astrology reading from me here). What I do know is that there seems to be a whole bunch of Sagittarius markers going on WITH Atlas.

    • It seems to have originally come from the area of space that houses the Galactic Center (which is at 27° Sagittarius)
      -There have been things circulating online that ATLAS came FROM the GC. After doing my own research and talking to my astrophysicist friend, I have found that this is probably NOT the case. However, just the fact that it comes from the area around the GC seems symbolic & meaningful
    • The last planet that it will get remotely close to is Jupiter on March 16, 2026 before it leaves our solar system (Jupiter is the planetary ruler of Sagittarius)
    • It makes its closest contact with Earth on December 19, 2025 (the day that the New Moon in Sagittarius takes place). Picture of that chart with the position of 3I/ATLAS at the top of the page.

    The name is also interesting – 3I/ATLAS. Let’s break down why this is interesting:
    **Before some jerkoff is like “iTS nAMeD aFtER thE tELEscOpE tHAt FouND iT!”…yeah, I know that (the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System or ATLAS). Even so, the name is still interesting to me**

    1. I was lying in bed one night thinking about this comet (like I do with ~*deep space shit*~) and saying the name over and over in my head, and I realized that “3i” sounds an awful lot like “third eye.” What does this mean in the context OF Atlas? Not totally sure. It does make me wonder if this comet is doing something energetically to “activate” the third eye of us Earthlings (individually and collectively). Think about it, though – people who have gone through any kind of “awakening” or “activation” of their third eye usually report that they hit a crisis point before or during this happens. The Earth currently feels like it’s AT a crisis point, so there *might* be something to this. 
      -It is said that if one tries to open their third eye too quickly (and/or they aren’t actually ready for this opening) it can cause a person to, essentially, lose their shit. Think about it – the world feels like it has been going off the fucking rails for a while, but 2025 seems to have accelerated things. There are certainly things in astroweather to back this up, but I do have to wonder if ATLAS could be in play, too.
    2. What is an Atlas? It’s a collection of maps in book form.
      ….and which sign of the zodiac is the one that travels & takes journeys (and might need an atlas of some kind)? Sagittarius.
    3. The name “Atlas” is generally thought to mean “bearer” or the “one who endures.” Atlas was also the name of a Titan who was punished to hold up the heavens after being on the losing end of a 10-year war with Zeus (the Titanomachy). He was said to have been a mathematician, philosopher, navigator, and astronomer (in some versions of his story he is credited with inventing astronomy all together) and is also said to have created the first celestial sphere. Because of his tie to (or creation of) astronomy, he was seen as “the one who turned the heavens on their axis.”
      **I don’t know about y’all, but to me there is something VERY Chiron-esque about Atlas’ mythology.**
      -There have been different things named after the Titan Atlas, like the Atlas Mountains in Africa, the Atlantic Ocean (name derived from the Sea of Atlas), and even the lost civilization of Atlantis first mentioned by Plato. 
    4. The “Atlas Personality” in psychology belongs to someone who feels they bear a massive amount of weight and responsibility on their shoulders (usually because of too much responsibility given to the person in childhood). This can cause depression, anxiety, feelings of emptiness and the need to be a chronic caretaker. 
      **There also appears to be something deeply Saturnian about all of this, too. Chiron (which 3I/ATLAS also seems to resonate) is thought of as a bridge between Saturn (the inner planets) and Uranus (the outer planets); moving from what is known and “old” to what is unknown and “the future.”

    So…. there is a lot going on in the above that needs to be talked about. First of all, there is the tie with navigation that stands out. Could it be that ATLAS is here to help us navigate something? Here to open our third eye (collectively and individually) so that we have “eyes to see”? If this is the case, then there is the question of do we even all have eyes to see in the first place? I mean, I think we do…. eventually anyway (I’m just not sure that EVERYONE is in that place right now – I mean, look at the fucking state of the world!). The next thing to mention is the idea that Atlas was seen as “the one who turned the heavens on their axis.” Just think about the gravity and weight of that statement for a minute – someone who is thought to turn the heaven’s on their axis would have a tremendous responsibility tied to them. Even the name Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System sounds like it is saddled with a whole fuck-ton of responsibility, too. Is 3I/ATLAS here to show us something about responsibility (or, perhaps, to show us something about the weight that is tied to the choices that we as individuals and the collective have made here on Earth)? Perhaps also to encourage us to make the “right” choices that benefit the individual as well as the collective? Also to point out: in the mythology, Atlas and the other Titans were battling Zeus (aka Jupiter)…another tie in with Sagittarius. SO MANY SAGITTARIUS MARKERS.

    The thing going on with “Atlas” and “Atlantis” stands out to me, along with the conjunction between 3I/Atlas and the South Node during the New Moon in Sagittarius on December 19, 2025. Setting intentions and planting seeds are fantastic ways to work with the energy of a New Moon (under most circumstances), and here it feels like that still tracks.  The reason why this date is a big deal in relation to 3I/ATLAS is because THIS is the date that 3I/ATLAS will come closest to the Earth (though it’s not really “close” – that’s misleading – but it’s the closest that it will come to Earth). Now, Atlantis was first mentioned by Plato as being an advanced civilization (from before the time of its first mentioning) that sank into the ocean after some cataclysmic event. Regardless of if Atlantis ever exited on this Earth or not (or in another dimension 👀) doesn’t really matter…but what does matter is the REPRESENTATION of Atlantis as some kind of “utopian” society. 

    Parabola of "the middle"

    We have people today running around like it’s the “end times” (there were literally people claiming on social media that they were going to be raptured just last month in October 2025). But it’s not the end times….at least not in the way that WE think of the “end.” The astrophysicist and myself were talking about this the other day, how we are NOT at the end times, but instead we are somewhere around “the middle” of times (hence the illustration of the upward facing parabola). Therefore, it feels a little (or a lot!) like 3I/ATLAS could be the symbol of the end of one age and the dawning of a new one.

    Why do I mention all of the above? Because ATLAS feels, to me anyway, very much like it could be a “way back” to something very ancient, to something that is “better” than what we currently have going on all over planet Earth. This feels even more apt for its closest contact with Earth on December 19, 2025 and the conjunction ATLAS @ roughly 10° Virgo makes with the South Node at 11° Virgo. Could we take this New Moon in Sagittarius (and its conjunction with the Galactic Center) as an opportunity – opportunity is SUCH a Sag expression – to set intentions for (or plant seeds towards) “going back” to an ancient way of being (like the Atlanteans in their utopian prime)? IF we were to all individually and collectively try and concentrate our efforts on making ourselves “better,” our individuals cups could then pour out onto the collective, thus making the collective “better,” too (and we wouldn’t have to stay “stuck” in the middle of the fucking parabola).
    **The “going back” thing ALSO stands out because of the initial anti-tail that 3I/ATLAS exhibited …until the tail seemed to change (and now it has 5 fucking tails or some shit?). The anti-tail felt/feels to me a little like (apparent) retrograde motion…and retrograde motion, quite literally, points towards “going back.”

    During this New Moon in Sagittarius (conjunct the Galactic Center), not only will 3I/ATLAS be conjunct the South Node, but it will also be conjunct a black hole at 10° 22′ Virgo known as M-106. No one knows the size of this black hole, but it is probable that it’s “supermassive.” Some attributes (besides having the densest galactic core of any measured) of this black hole are:
    -Specifically, feeling like time is speeding up and/or getting longer
    -Assessment of spatial relations needs to take place (because these can be both warped and/or precognitive in nature to the extreme)
    -Big tasks become known to needing to happen, and the energy needs to flow towards those tasks with mental fortitude. Doing THIS will quiet the “chaos”

    Mercury in Sagittarius, the ruler of 3I/ATLAS in this chart, is square 3I/ATLAS. This makes me think that while we might all (on some level) understand the assignment at this time, it doesn’t mean that everyone will DO the assignment or remember to turn in their homework. Sometimes the BEST thing we can do is live by example (“be the change” kind of thing) and focus on living by that individual example. Everyone else will either catch up….or they won’t (THIS very thing feels little Atlas Personality-like, too).
    **The cataclysmic event that destroyed Atlantis (assuming it was real here on Earth) is said to have happened because the people angered the “Gods” and these gods either just sunk Atlantis to the bottom of the ocean, or it was a volcanic eruption spurred on by pissed off sky-daddies. Rolling with this, it feels like in the present day we’re starting out at a cataclysmic point and trying to pull our way out of it (since we are “in the middle” of the parabola). IF we all pull together, eventually we can ALL get out of the middle and be “on the upswing.”

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part XXVI

    Galactic Center Thoughts part XXVI

    Lately I’ve been firing on (all) galactic cylinders due to a conversation that I got to have with an astrophysicist who reached out to me. They came across my research and were curious about my findings…so we set up some time to have a conversation. They got my mind going, I got their mind going….it was like a mind buzzing fest 🤣. They got me thinking about things with the Galactic Center a little differently than I have in the past. One of these ways is by considering the Galactic Center in an astrology chart by House placement alone (more can be read about that here). While I always figured that House placement was important, my research up until this point has been focused on planetary conjunctions to the Galactic Center (and other galactic points). While the research has not stopped on planetary conjunctions to the Galactic Center (and other galactic points), a new addition to the research has been birthed from this conversation.  

    Falling into the Galactic Center

    **Real quick! If you would like to be a part of the research, please send an email to ellie@saturnseason.com and I’ll hook you up with the questionnaire. If you would like me to read your astrology chart for you (about the galactic stuff or otherwise), that can be done by clicking on this text. If you are more of a watcher than a reader, click this text to watch a video about this same stuff.**

    Oh! But there is more. I have found over the course of this research that certain keywords/archetypes seem to fit for the Galactic Center. Archetypes like spiritualized, distorted, fragmented, warped, mutated, transformed, extreme, intense….and some other Uranian/Neptunian/Plutonian expressions (the GC is VERY aligned with the outer planets and seems to share several of their keywords). The GC also seems to have an affinity for retrograde motion – planets conjunct the GC (regardless of being direct or not) seem to function LIKE a retrograde planet. Now, the astrophysicist has added another possible keyword to the Galactic Center toolbox:

    Me: “What may be the consciousness (archetype) of a black hole be if one were to try to assign understanding to it.” 
    Astrophysicist: “I think I know what the answer is.”
    Me: “What?”
    Astrophysicist: “It seems obvious, but it’s
    HIDDEN.”
    (Me staring at them…begging them with my eyes to continue)
    Astrophysicist: “So… from the outside you cannot know, but once you’re in, you have the ultimate truth. It’s the same thing to do with ALL of these things (the galactic points) indicate – the higher self.”

    You have no idea HOW MUCH OF A DUMBSHIT I felt after hearing the keyword “hidden” come from them (but I felt like a dumbshit in the best possible way). In ALL OF THE YEARS that I’ve researched the Galactic Center I don’t remember EVER assigning this as an archetype for the GC. In retrospect it feels really fucking stupid that I never have. I mean, black holes ARE hidden – they are literally black in space (which is also dark) and can’t be seen unless you’re looking through special telescopes. Their gravitational pull is so intense that not even light can escape them. So…while I KNOW that this is a quality of black holes (and the Galactic Center), it was never a quality (or archetype) that I attributed TO the Galactic Center. For the past week or so, I have been meditating and thinking about the notion of HIDDEN being a keyword for the GC. Like, wtf does that even mean 😂?! This is a major part of the new phase of the research – trying to figure out WHAT exactly “hidden” means in the context of the Galactic Center. There are a few possibilities that come to mind when I think about this:


    -Only YOU see these areas of life. Other people don’t seem to notice them about you or you don’t get noticed in those house areas of life (either at all or the way that you would like to be noticed)
    -These house areas of life can only be accessed by going inward (not able to be accessed through the external world)
    -These areas of life feel like they may actually BE somewhat hidden or obscured from you

    This new phase of the research focuses specifically on the Galactic Center by House placement, but the notion of the GC being “hidden” could (and SHOULD!) also be applied to planets conjunct the Galactic Center. Since the Galactic Center is always in Sagittarius (until it moves into Capricorn in, like 300 years or whatever), this feels like a hidden understanding of something (since one of the ways that Sagittarius energy functions is through understanding things and assimilating information from things). It really depends on the WHOLE chart as to how this actually plays out for the native, but I could see it going a few different ways (or maybe ALL of these ways at different points in the person’s life):

    Example: Native has the GC in the 11th House (no planets conjunct). The person may feel like their influence (11th House) is hidden in some way – either they are “hiding” it from themselves (or hiding from the influence they have), or maybe other people don’t see the influence the native has. It might also be that it’s not until the person goes inward that the influence (and other 11th House areas of life) they have is seen by the native and by other people. 
    **This same sort of idea above could also be applied to planets conjunct the Galactic Center and WHAT the planet wants to express/needs to express being hidden in some way from the native (or to anyone outside of the native).

    The astrophysicist and I also did some talking about the notion of the higher self in relationship with the Galactic Center. Now, somewhat early on in the research I started thinking that the Galactic Center (and some of the other galactic points) were a way for a person to tap into their higher self (maybe not the only way, but definitely A WAY to do this…a telephone line to it). With their comment about going inward with the Galactic Center to tap into the higher self (and there was much more to this conversation than the part that I copied to this post) makes me think EVEN MORE that I am on a right track with this. How does this translate to the idea of the GC being “hidden” in some way (or there being something hidden about it)? Maybe the native isn’t able to reach their higher self (all of the way) until the native goes inward by the house areas of life of where the GC falls. Same thing could be said about any planets conjunct the GC. Going inward is ALSO what retrograde planets do (what they need to do to function), so this tracks from what I’ve already ascertained from the research thus far; that the Galactic Center has an affinity for retrograde motion. All of this, getting in touch with the higher self via different galactic points, is also (probably) an ever-evolving process, across time and space….across a person’s WHOLE lifetime.  

  • Galactic Center Thoughts XXV

    Galactic Center Thoughts XXV

    Over the 5 plus years that I have been researching the Galactic Center (and other galactic points), my focus has been primarily on planets conjunct the Galactic Center (and friends). What happens to planets conjunct the Galactic Center, etc. and what that means for the planet (and the person). What I haven’t focused on (as much) is the Galactic Center by House placement…and the impact that the GC has on the house in which it falls in an astrology chart. To be honest, in retrospect, it feels a little stupid of me to have seemingly neglected this piece of the research. I mean, don’t get me wrong, I KNOW WHY I have been so focused on conjunctions to the Galactic Center (and friends). If a person has a planet, angle, etc. conjunct the GC, etc., it makes sense that the planet, angle, etc. would be “mutated” (or other GC keywords) by the GC…which makes the planet part of this equation an important one to focus on. I’m not shifting the focus of my research (conjunctions to the GC ARE important!), but I want to begin integrating this other phase of the research to what I already have going on. 

    Me: “This also brings me to another question, and I realize that you don’t do what I do so you might not be able to answer this, but I’ll ask you and you tell me what you think… intuitively if it makes sense. Okay, so my focus has been primarily on conjunctions to these things (the Galactic Center, etc.), but I also have, you know, I haven’t focused as much on people (research) that don’t have anything conjunct the Galactic Center. You know, there are a lot of people that don’t have anything conjunct the GC, they just have the GC, like, in their Third House or something. Like, they just have it there. I haven’t focused as much on that, but I’ve always had a feeling that it probably intensified that house’s areas of life?” 

    Answerer: “I think it must.”

    What got my mind moving in this seemingly obvious direction? Someone found me through my Galactic Center research that is an astrophysicist…and is EXACTLY WHO I have been seeking out to speak with for years (without realizing that I was looking for them specifically 🤣). A very small piece of a conversation we had is above; I’m the one asking the question and they are the answerer. For privacy reasons I won’t be revealing who they are but trust me when I say they know their shit. And they have given me SO MUCH to think about (this particular piece feels very mutual 🤣 it seems like I get their mind buzzing as much as they get mine buzzing).

    Hypothesis (look at me being inspired to cosplay scientist 🤣): The Galactic Center in an astrology chart plays a huge role in the chart even if there happens to be no planets, angles, asteroids, etc. conjunct the GC in the chart. This translates down to the house that the GC falls, and this house’s “areas of life” may hold a lot of “weight” for the native.

    **Real quick! If you would like to be a part of the research, please send an email to ellie@saturnseason.comand I’ll hook you up with the questionnaire. If you would like me to read your astrology chart for you (about the galactic stuff or otherwise), that can be done by clicking on this text.  And! If you are more of a watcher than a reader, here is a YouTube video on the same sort of stuff ^_^
     
    Words like “extreme,” “intense,” “spiritual,” “distorted,”  “highly-charged,” “mutation,” and “fragmentation” are some of the first words that come to mind when I think about the Galactic Center. If I were to assign the GC “keywords” (or it’s own “consciousness”) to explain what it does….which, over the years, is exactly what I have done…these are the words I would choose. Through the research these particular keywords seem to fit for people when they consider the impact that the Galactic Center has on planets, etc. that happen to be conjunct it in their charts. Now I’m wondering if the same thing could be said about the Galactic Center’s effect on the house that it falls in the natal chart (regardless if there happens to be a planet conjunct the GC or not). 
    **You might notice that the keywords I have given the GC over the years have ties to Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. This is because I do feel  (and have always felt) like the GC has ties to the outer planets….almost like it encompasses ALL of their qualities in different ways and at different times. 

    For instance, let’s say someone has the Galactic Center in their Third House with no planets conjunct it. My thought (going with this train of thought) is that the GC being in the Third House will impact the “areas of life” which the house represents…JUST because the GC is in that house. In this example, it could cause there to be some distortion/spiritualized/intense/extreme/highly charged/mutated/fragmented regarding the person’s communication, their thoughts, their perception of things, and other Third House areas of life. This could also translate to the person have some kind of difference (or mutation) to their learning which could present as a learning difference of some kind. Difference in this context could be anything from being “gifted” to “disabled” which is why I use the term “learning difference”). The possibilities are endless…and this is exactly what I am wanting to figure out.

    Since the bulk of this particular piece of the research hinges on the house that the Galactic Center falls, everyone should probably be aware of WHAT (or areas of life) that the houses represent. They are as follows:
    *First House – sense of self, knee jerk reactions to the world, the vibe of the person
    *Second House – resources/money, values/self-value, security, stability, survival, where we are comfortable (or not!)
    *Third House – communication, basic learning (school), thinking, area that is local to you, logic & reason
    *Fourth House – home, family, private spheres of life, the deeply conscious
    *Fifth House – creative self-expression, risk taking (or not), leisure/hobbies, lighter side of sex and dating, where we create (this can include children)
    *Sixth House – work/work environment, daily routines/habits, health of the body & mind, real world, unequal relationships
    *Seventh House – relationships/partnerships of ALL varieties, legal contracts, balance (or lack thereof)
    *Eighth House – other people’s money/resources/values (or those that are shared), deep soul merging between two people, insecurity, instability, discomfort, inheritance (tangible & intangible), the bridge between the conscious & unconscious
    *Ninth House – understanding & assimilating information, higher learning (university, etc.), areas that are NOT local, abstract thinking, beliefs of all kinds
    *Tenth House – public spheres of life, career, reputation, goals & ambitions (or lack thereof)
    *Eleventh House – long term goals, hopes & wishes, influence, (career) legacy, what we share with other people, friends/groups/social & humanitarian causes
    *Twelfth House – health of the mind & spirit, release (what this house wants most of all), the unconscious/unseen, imprisonment (of all kinds), escape, spirituality
    **This above is in no means a complete list, lol, but it gives you an idea for the purposes of this blog post and if you know nothing about astrology and want to partake in the research**
    ….and as a side note, if you want to REALLY LEARN how to read an astrology chart, check out the Star Cards. 

    Now, the astrophysicist has added another possible keyword to the Galactic Center:
    Me: “What may be the consciousness (archetype) of a black hole be if one were to try to assign understanding to it.” 
    Answerer: “I think I know what the answer is.”
    Me: “What?”
    Answerer: “It seems obvious, but it’s HIDDEN.”
    (Me staring at them…begging them with my eyes to continue)
    Answerer: “So… from the outside you cannot know, but once you’re in, you have the ultimate truth. It’s the same thing to do with ALL of these things (the galactic points) indicate – the higher self.”

    You have no idea HOW MUCH OF A DUMBSHIT I felt after hearing the keyword “hidden” come from them (but I felt like a dumbshit in the best possible way). In ALL OF THE YEARS that I’ve researched the Galactic Center I don’t remember EVER assigning this as an archetype. In retrospect it feels really fucking stupid that I never have. I mean, black holes ARE hidden – they are literally black in space and can’t be seen. Their gravitational pull is so intense that not even light can escape them. So this begs the next part of my thought process – could there be things about the house in which the GC falls that are HIDDEN to the native? And if any planets DO happen to be conjunctions the GC, does that make things about that planet hidden to the person? There ARE SO MANY ways to think about this (which I will be doing for a while, probably).

    In the words of the astrophysicist: “These things are not going to NOT affect us.” 
    (These things that they are talking about are the galactic points)

  • The Great Attractor and what it might mean in an Astrology Chart

    The Great Attractor and what it might mean in an Astrology Chart

    This post was originally published on September 2, 2021. As time has gone on (and my understanding of deep space astrology has deepened) I have learned more about how to possibly incorporate this deep space anomaly into reading an astrology chart. Rather than doing a whole new post on the Great Attractor, I figured I would bring together the old post with the new stuff that I’ve learned. Also, as of September 2024 there IS a questionnaire on the Great Attractor, the Shapley Attractor, and the Dipole Repeller. If you want to be a part of the research (volunteer as tribute 🤣) shoot an email to ellie@saturnseason.com and I’ll get you the questionnaire!

    Where is the Great Attractor located? Currently it’s at 14° 17′ Sagittarius.

    **Here is a video that I did about the Great Attractor in September 2021 if you’re more of a watcher than a reader. These videos from July 2023 are about the Shapley Attractor and the Dipole Repeller (which is what opposes Shapley in space). There is also a recent post written about the Shapley Attractor that can be found here.
    **If you would like for me to read your astrology chart, click this to set something up**

    *********** Blog Post from 2021 Starts Below ***********
    Lately I’ve been getting some messages on reddit (and even emails from previous clients) asking me about the Great Attractor – wanting to know if I will ever be discussing/diving into this, or if I was even aware of this anomaly in space in the first place. Since it has come up enough, I figured I would do a post about this since I am aware of this and it IS on my radar (I have just been too preoccupied with clients and the GC to really dive in). I am absolutely delighted that so many of you all are aware of the Great Attractor too ^_^

    So…..what is the Great Attractor? It is supposedly the gravitational pull point in the Laniakea Supercluster (a “meta-galaxy”/collection of superclusters of galaxies in which our own galaxy is a part of). It is considered an anomaly because the Great Attractor functions like a black hole (it warps time, space, and light), but unlike a black hole it has no event horizon (so it doesn’t fit the standard definition OF a black hole). The Great Attractor appears to be pulling different super clusters of galaxies towards it, and scientists believe that our own galaxy supercluster is also being pulled towards it. The GA is also thought to be made up of “dark energy.” The definition of dark energy is “anything that is, in effect, an intrinsic property of space. That has a constant energy density regardless of the dimensions of the volume under consideration. Thus, unlike ordinary matter it is not diluted by the expansion of space.” Dark energy is thought to be the reason that the universe is accelerating in its rate of expansion (though no one seems like they are 100% sure about this). Dark doesn’t mean literally dark (or bad/negative), but “mysterious” and “unknown,” and unknown it is – while it is thought to make up a whole bunch of space, scientists still aren’t real sure what the fuck dark energy is.

    Same thing could be said about the GA – scientists KNOW there is something there pulling these different superclusters towards it, but they aren’t real sure how to classify the GA. To make it even more difficult to understand, the GA happens to fall in the zone of avoidance (which means it isn’t easy to see it with visible light wavelengths due to being blocked by the Milky Way’s galactic plane). The only way that it has been observed is with X-rays (though the area of space where they think the GA is located happens to be in an area where the Norma Cluster of galaxies is located). So, lol, that’s fucking weird. If this is actually like a black hole, shouldn’t it be “sucking” up the Norma Cluster?

    Why does any of this matter? I like to look at the science behind this deep space shit to try to apply it to an astrology chart. Here are some thoughts that I have about the GA and how it might function in a natal chart. While the GA can be pulled in anyone’s chart, I do think it probably has the most impact in the lives of people who have conjunctions to the GA (planets, Chiron, the Nodes, cardinal points, etc.).
    -Even if scientists aren’t sure WHAT the GA is or HOW the GA functions, it does seem to be some kind of force that pulls things to it. This makes me think that the GA in a natal chart functions in a similar way – acting as an attracting force. Is this for the good of the person, or to the person’s detriment? I’m a little on the fence about this particular notion. I feel like this could really go either way.
    -Since the GA happens to be in the Zone of Avoidance in the sky, I feel like this can probably be translated down to the natal chart, too. The person may not be as clear about what the GA attracts into their life (or even what they can consciously attract when they are able to SEE/FEEL the GA in their own charts and how it functions).
    -A planet conjunct the GA (or cardinal point, Chiron, etc.) may attract things into the native’s life dealing with whatever planet (et.al) is involved in the conjunction. This person may not have as much conscious control of what they attract in this regard. However, I have this idea that when the person is consciously aware of what they attract, they are probably able to attract exactly what they want to them (this probably takes a lot of self-control and self-awareness).
    -I have mentioned before that the Galactic Center might function like an antenna, picking up shit from the GC and even shooting stuff back out from the antenna. I think the GA might function in a similar way (but it DOES feel different than the GC, even if they both have the feeling of having this antenna). I’ll have to sit with this part a little longer to figure out exactly HOW to articulate the difference, lol.

    How can you pull the Great Attractor in your own chart? Go to astro.com and go to the “extended chart selection” after creating an account. Go down to where it says “additional objects” towards the bottom, and click on the list of “fixed stars.” Go down the list, and once you get to the G’s, look for something labeled “Great Attractor, GA.” Click on that option and then pull your chart.

    There is something else here to mention….something that kind of “ups the ante” of the GA, and this something called the Shapley Attractor. Scientists have proposed that the Shapley Attractor might be stronger than the Great Attractor, and that the Shapley Attractor MIGHT be the “collaboration” between the Shapley Supercluster and the Great Attractor coming together to create a whole new attractor. I have NO idea how to pull this in the chart (but I’m looking into it, lol).

    ********* New stuff starts below this page break *********


    First of all, it really blows my fucking mind that the original blog post on the Great Attractor was written over 3 years ago (currently it’s September 2024). Time goes so, so fast. Even though we are 3 years out from when I wrote the original post, my train of thought on the Great Attractor is still similar. There are some things that I would like to add on to what I was included in the original post. Before I get into that though, I am now looking at conjunctions within 7° applying with and separating from the Great Attractor at (currently) 14° Sagittarius (and this is where I am focused on the questionnaire). If you have planets conjunct the GA within that window of orb and want to be a part of the research, please reach out and I’ll get you the questionnaire. What I’m adding to the original article (in the text below) comes from people sharing their experiences with me via email (even without a formal questionnaire existing until now people love to share their experiences) from conversations I’ve had with clients in readings about planets, etc. conjunct the GA, and based on my own study of this deep space anomaly.

    1. In the original post I mentioned that the Great Attractor could act as an attracting force in an astrology chart (causing the native to pull or attract things to them). The comment was also made that I was on the fence (in 2021) as to if this was to the native’s benefit or detriment. Really, as of September 2024, I do think of the Great Attractor as a more “benevolent” force (or that the things attracted do tend to be for the native’s benefit overall). As a disclaimer, that doesn’t mean that the Great Attractor will ALWAYS function in “positive” ways (this is not universal by any means).
    -I also think that this attraction and pull is ALWAYS happening whether the person is aware of it or not. It seems to me that this attraction and pull could be even more beneficial for the native when they are aware that they have this kind of pull in the first place.
    -The pull/attraction with the GA also appears to be the kind of pull where once the attraction and pulling begins, it can be really hard to turn it off or take it back. This is another reason it seems important to know what pull and attracting are happening to begin with, so the wheels of attraction that are set in motion are actually ones that the person wants to consciously set in motion in the first place. Even then, because once these wheels seem to start turning they are hard to turn off, it’s a good idea for the GA person to triple check with themselves that what they are wanting to attract is ACTUALLY what they want.

    2. People with Great Attractor conjunctions in their chart seem to be people that are looked to for answers about things. This seems to be the case even if the native doesn’t see themselves in the same knowing-capacity (and it can be very confusing when the person isn’t aware of the planet, etc. conjunct the GA exerting this influence). For instance, if someone has Venus conjunct the GA, they might find that to other people they are seen as all-knowing in regards to things Venus wants to express (things like love, harmony, relationships, values, etc.), and they might also find that other people seek out the Venus conjunct GA person for answers about Venusian questions. This doesn’t mean that the Venus conjunct GA native sees themselves in this same way; on the contrary, the native might not see themselves as proficient on Venusian topics at all. Even if they don’t think they have the answers to Venusian sorts of questions….they usually do (and they can usually offer some good insights, advice, or answers about such things).

    3. The Great Attractor seems to be less “polarizing” than the Galactic Center (and the Galactic Grand Cross) seems to be. Some of this is probably because there doesn’t appear to be anything opposite the Great Attractor (so there isn’t an opposition to cause any polarity in the first place). Normally this lack of opposition would bother me (and I would be like a dog with a fucking bone trying to figure out WHAT opposes it). In this case it doesn’t bother me because one theory within the scientific community about the Great Attractor is that it’s actually part of the Shapley Attractor/Supercluster (and the Shapley Attractor DOES have the Dipole Repeller in opposition). Bringing this down to the astrology chart, the person with conjunctions to the GA seems to not be seen as polarizing (or that specific part of their chart is not seen as polarizing). For instance, Venusian thoughts and expressions by the person with Venus conjunct the GA might be seen as not at all polarizing by other people. This could be because the native really doesn’t approach Venus notions in a polarizing way (which is absolutely possible). Or it could be because another person just doesn’t SEE the Venus conjunct GA person as being polarizing.

    4. The above brings me to my last point – the person with something conjunct the Great Attractor seems to have something about them that causes other people to SEE what they WANT/NEED to see in the person regarding the planet, etc. conjunct the GA (this is another reason why these people may come off as not polarizing regarding to the planet, etc. conjunct the GA, especially if the person on the outside WANTS/NEEDS to view the GA person as non-polarizing). This isn’t the GA person making themselves seem a different way than they are, but more about how they are received by other people (there doesn’t appear to be the manipulation or malice involved on the part of the GA person). Now, this can be a beneficial thing for the GA person or not beneficial at all; it really depends on what is WANTED/NEEDED to be seen in the GA person by someone else. Regardless of what other people want/need to see in the GA person, it’s most important that the planet conjunct GA person sees themselves (and that planet conjunct the GA) clearly and without a filter.


  • The Shapley Attractor and how to read it in an astrology chart

    The Shapley Attractor and how to read it in an astrology chart

    A little over a year ago I did a video on the Shapley Attractor but never made an “astrological ramblings” post about it (I have tried to make more time for writing recently and it feels SO GOOD to be doing this again). Why do this post now? Well, there has been an influx of people reaching out over the summer about different Galactic conjunctions they have in their charts, and conjunctions to Shapley (and the Great Attractor) have been brought up a whole bunch. Since Shapley and the Great Attractor aren’t actually ON the Galactic Grand Cross questionnaire, I think some people have wondered if I have done any research on them at all. In answer to that question…yes, yes I have (eventually the Great Attractor, Shapley, and even the Dipole Repeller need to be added to the current questionnaire or a new one needs to be created). 
    **Side note: If anyone wants to be a part of the Galactic Center/Galactic Grand Cross research, shoot me an email or leave a comment on this post and I’ll get you the questionnaire ^_^ And if you’re more of a watcher than a reader, video incoming below:



    What is the Shapley Attractor? It’s a deep space anomaly (an even bigger anomaly than the Great Attractor!) that functions kind of like a black hole but isn’t a black hole. As far as I know (in 2024 as I’m writing this) scientists aren’t really sure what the hell Shapley actually is. What science does seem to know is that Shapley appears to be pulling things towards it (like the Great Attractor does, but Shapley does this in a more extreme way), and that it appears to be within (or near) the Shapley Supercluster. The Shapley Attractor is pulling a BUNCH of different galaxies towards it due to its high density and gravitational pull.  
    -There is a line of thought that brings the Great Attractor and Shapley together, viewing the Shapley Attractor as a composite of the Shapley Supercluster and the Great Attractor. There is line of thought that the Great Attractor is being pulled TOWARDS the Shapley Attractor instead of functioning with Shapley. There is another line of thought that the Great Attractor and the Shapley Attractor have no correlation with one another (they are just, essentially, two attractor anomalies in the sky that happen to function in a similar way but that’s it). No one really seems to know anything definitively one way or the other as of September 2024
    -Like the Great Attractor, the Shapley Attractor is lying behind the Zone of Avoidance meaning that it’s very hard to see (like the GA) with visible light wavelengths. 
    -Shapley Supercluster/Concentration is pulling itself together instead of expanding with the universe (and pulling other galaxies towards it in the process). 


    The Shapley Attractor can be found at 2° Scorpio (I’m not sure how to pull this in a natal chart, you will just need to eyeball it – in the chart above I have a yellow star where Shapley would be found if it could be pulled). In my research on this so far, I’ve been focused on conjunctions between planets, angles, etc. in the chart. While a large orb, I’ve been looking at conjunctions 7° applying with and separating from Shapley as being influenced and pulled. So, essentially, any planets, angles, etc. that you may have from 25° Libra to 9° Scorpio would be within Shapley’s grasp. Obviously, the closer the planet, angle, etc. is to 2° Scorpio, the more of a pull Shapley will have on it (and the more it will be influenced by Shapley). 

    So…..like….what the fuck can one DO with Shapley in an astrology chart? How can one read it in a chart and bring it down to Earth? I definitely have some thoughts on what Shapley could indicate alongside any planets, etc. that happen to be conjunct.

    Shapley is an attractor like the Great Attractor (GA), which means any planets, angles, etc. that happen to be conjunct EITHER of these will ATTRACT people, places, things, and situations towards it. Also like the GA, Shapley is in the “Zone of Avoidance” which is an area of space that can’t be seen with visible light waves. Even if the GA & Shapley can’t be seen with visible light waves, though, they both still exist. This makes me think that planets, etc. conjunct Shapley (and the GA) are always attracting something towards it…. even if the person isn’t conscious of this attracting that happens as it is happening. This right here makes me think that people with conjunctions to Shapley need to be VERY aware of what they attract into their lives via the planet, angle, etc. that is conjunct Shapley. It does seem to me that the attraction that occurs with Shapley (as with the GA) tends to have an affinity for the planet, angle, etc. that happens to be conjunct Shapley (or the GA). 
    **For instance (using my chart as an example), I have Mars conjunct Shapley within 2°. This means that I need to be very aware of the kind of Mars people, places, things, and situations that I pull into my life. I’m going to PULL this stuff into my life no matter what, so I need to make sure that I’m only pulling to me the highest vibration of Mars in Scorpio energy. 
    …..and THAT’S the challenging part, pulling in the highest vibration of Mars in Scorpio energy (or the highest vibrational energy of whatever planet, angle, etc. happens to be conjunct Shapley). 

    Shapley does feel like it’s more challenging than the Great Attractor; this has been gleaned from my own personal experience, client experience, family/friend experience, and of people who have wanted to share with me their personal experience with Shapley even though there isn’t an official questionnaire about it yet. There are a couple of reasons why I think this is the case:
    1. Shapley happens to be along Via Combusta (also known as the “Fiery Way” and the “Burning Way” from 15° Libra to 15° Scorpio). Since olden times (lol) this part of the chart is thought to bring “bad luck” to any planets, angles, etc. that happen to fall there because of all the difficult fixed stars in the area.  I’m not sure how much traditional astrologers actually work with this antiquated idea in a natal chart in present day, but due to the fixed star thing it IS used in horary astrology/event astrology (seeing a planet along Via Combusta, especially the Moon, in a horary chart/event chart can signal some fuckery and/or difficult shit afoot). 
    2. Scorpio energy is SO extreme and intense, and Shapley happens to be in the sign of Scorpio. This in and of itself makes me think of Shapley functioning in a more challenging way than the Great Attractor. 
    **That’s not to say that the Great Attractor can’t be challenging though (it definitely CAN be). While Sagittarius energy can definitely function in “big” and “extra” kinds of ways, it often lacks the extremity of Scorpio energy. 


    Because Scorpio energy is SO extreme (this is one of the ways that it can function), it seems to me that WHATEVER is attracted via Shapley is going to be attracted in an extreme way. All planets, etc. in the chart have a higher vibrational and lower vibrational way that they can function (what they want to express). In saying that, it IS possible to pull the highest vibrational energy of the planet, etc. conjunct Shapley into one’s life (the “positive” extreme), but more often than not (not universally….but often) it seems that people pull in the the lowest vibrational energy (the “negative” extreme) of the planet, etc. conjunct Shapley in the form of people, places, things and situations. Attraction of the lowest vibrational energy of the planet, etc. appears to happen for a couple of reasons:
    1. The person is expressing what the planet, etc. conjunct Shapley wants to express in an extremely low vibrational way (this may or may not be a conscious choice). Should this be the case, the person could come face to face with people, places, things, and situations that are also expressing the lower vibration of that planetary (etc.) energy. The point of this seems to be to show the person how they are and, ideally, how they don’t want to be.
    2. The person isn’t expressing what the planet, etc. conjunct Shapley wants to express AT ALL in the first place (again, this may or may not be a conscious choice). Should the person come face to face to with people, places, things, and situations expressing the lowest vibration of what the planet (etc.) conjunct Shapley wants to express, it seems that it is to get the person to WAKE UP to their own planet conjunct Shapley (or to WAKE that planet up). Should this person have their planet “woken up” in this way, they want to not stoop to the lowest vibrational level of the planet, etc. Instead, it seems important that they go a different way, a higher vibrational way, with that planetary, etc. energy.

    When the highest vibration of the planet, etc. is expressed through the planet conjunct Shapley, it seems that the person is able to pull in the VERY BEST of the planetary energy in an extreme way in regards to people, places, things and situations (extremity doesn’t have to be “bad”). My advice? Get to know any planet, angle, etc. conjunct Shapley in your chart as best as you can. If you need help with this, you can have me read for you (click here for this).

    Want to go deeper into learning about this stuff?! I taught a class on July 9, 2026 on the galactic points: the Galactic Grand Cross, the Great Attractor, Shapley Attractor, and the Dipole Repeller. Five-plus years of research, brought down to earth. The recording of the class (along with notes student received) can be purchased below:

  • Interview with an Astrologer-Philip Sedgwick

    Interview with an Astrologer-Philip Sedgwick
    also known as the mack fucking daddy of the
    Galactic Center (and Galactic Astrology)

    This conversation took place on August 11, 2022, over zoom. Philip’s parts of the conversation are in bold, and mine are not bolded. The parts that are in parenthesis are things that might be necessary for one to know for some context of the question and/or answers (and also for other side notes).
    This entire conversation was such a professional highlight ^_^

    “Hey Philip!”

    “Hey Ellie. So, how the hell are you?”


    “I’m pretty good – I’m excited! How about you?”

    “I’m good. Do you want to ask me your questions, and that way I can have a little more of spontaneous response to them?”


    “Okay, sounds good! All of the questions were okay though, right?”
    (I always like to shoot over the questions that I want to ask in an interview before the interview happens).

    “Yeah, there’s a couple of answers that will be a little different than the track of the question, but nonetheless, it will work.”

    “Okay – that is fine. (I start getting my iPad out with the questions).
    “So, what got you interested in astrology in the first place? What was the spark?”

    “Well, I was in the Navy, and I was up for a security clearance, and one day I was in a coffee shop at the base where our ship was stationed, and this guy came up to me and asked me for my birthday. I told him, and he started telling me things about myself, and I went “There’s no way that he knows this – this has got to be part of my security clearance, and this guy is trying to trip me up. He’s trying to get me to admit that I stole an apple, or something like that, something that would mess with my top-secret clearance.” And it turned out that he set up my chart. This was back a few years and he had one of those blue Rosicrucian ephemerides, and he was reading directly from that. So, at that point I decided that if someone else can know this about me, I guess I better figure out what they know, so that I can know that too…because this isn’t cool. It was too revelatory.”

    “From him to know all of this from just –“

    “Yeah, it was like, it was creepy. I didn’t know what he was doing.”

    (I laugh)

    “I was on a navy frigate for the next several years, and we had a couple of deployments over to Asia, and in that time frame there were times that there wasn’t a lot to do. I had a copy of Linda Goodman’s Sun Signs and Dane Rudhyar’s Astrology of Personality, and that’s what got me into astrology. And the Astrology of Personality was really the thing – I met Leyla Rudhyar a number of years ago, and when I said, ‘it’s one of Rudhyar’s books that really got me hooked’, and she said ‘Oh, the Astrology of Personality.’ I said, ‘How did you know?’ and she said, ‘there are so many phenomenal stories about that book’. So, it was like ‘great, I’m glad to be one of the many.’”

    “I have that book – I keep some books outside with me when I work and that’s one that I always have outside with me.”

    “It’s amazing – absolutely amazing.”

    “Yes, it is.”

    “That was the beginning of the journey. Now, I know that you were curious about how I got into the Galactic Center.”

    (I give a big ass goofy smile because, lol, of course I’m curious).

    “So, after I got out of the Navy I was in San Diego, and I stumbled into an astrology group there, the San Diego Astrological Society, I believe they are still in operation. It’s a good group and at the time it was a phenomenal group. There was a weekend workshop, and I was participating in the workshop, giving a lecture, and there were 4 of us that weekend. It was held in Balboa Park, which is where the Sabian Symbols were derived.”

    “Oh that’s cool!”

    “It was also adjacent from where Neil Michelsen set up astro-computing services when he first moved to San Diego. So, San Diego was a happening astrological place. Well anyway, during one of the lectures Sagittarian Joyce Wehrman was speaking and she mentioned that the Galactic Center was at 26-degrees of Sagittarius. I thought ‘my midheaven is at 28-degrees Sagittarius – it must be my job to look into this.’ So, I started looking into it, I stumbled into it, and I encountered Michael Erlewine’s compilation Astrophysical Directions. With the encouragement of a few other people, I then began looking at some of the other galactic anomalies that were unusual and worthy of attention. One of those was the Super Galactic Center. Another one was Cygnus X-1, the black hole at about 13-degrees Aquarius. Those were the three things that I started looking at in 1976. This was all new stuff at the time. You know, Theodor Landscheidt had a book, Cosmic Cybernetics I believe was the name, and it had some stuff about the Galactic Center in it, and it was very useful. Nobody knew anything – I had sort of an engineering background, so my first thing was ‘what it is will tell us how it operates.’ So, I started investigating the qualities of the Galactic Center, and it is very strong in infrared radiation. I then began to make assessments into ‘well, here’s what infrared radiation might do for us,’ and I kind of put it on the human body with the chakras. The crown chakra at the top going into ultraviolet, the root chakra going into infrared. I made the initial assessment that the infrared energy would be impacting the root chakra, and all of that. At the time, we did not know that the Galactic Center was a supermassive black hole. Now we know that virtually every galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its core. We know that now, but at the time we didn’t know that. We did not know that it was a black hole at the center of the galaxy. And so, it was a matter of interpreting these qualities, and one of the things that was also true is that it was gravitationally massive – we did know that before we knew it was a black hole. Well, anything that is gravitational warps time and space – it just does. One of the early things that came out of that was, well, when you go all Sagittarian and pontificate from the Galactic Center, you know, people are going to go ‘that’s nice – that’s really nice, I’m glad you had that thought – I’m going to go get some ice cream.’”

    (I laugh because my Galactic Grand Cross lit up chart knows what the fuck he’s talking about)

    “And maybe, 6 months later, they’ll come around, and they’ll realize that what you said was valid, but they won’t remember that you said it. They’ll think they thought of it, like ‘I just had this great idea!’ and it’s like ‘well, I just had that thought 6 months ago.’ And they’re like ‘no you didn’t.’ And it’s like ‘yes I did – I wrote it down.’ So, there is an interesting thing that happens with the Sagittarian quality – if you wanna be the one in the know, you basically have to memorialize all of the insights that you get from the Galactic Center. You have to write shit down.

    “Yes!” (My eyes get big, and I nod my head exaggeratively – this is SO fucking true for shit that comes to a person from the GC).

    “If you don’t write it down, it goes away. You might say it, and the people around you are gunna look at you like you said, ‘shoehorns should be made of velvet.’ It’s like, that’s what they are going to think that you said. And then they’re like ‘what the hell are you talking about? I don’t get it, it’s not relevant.’ And so later, they will come around, and they’ll think about what you said. Now my favorite point about the Galactic Center is when the Wright Brother’s flew their plane back when they did at Kitty Hawk, there was a Sun/Uranus conjunction with the Galactic Center right in the middle. And this is when they flew their airplane. People went out there to watch them die. You know, it’s like going to the Indy 500 – you don’t go there to watch the race, you go there to watch the crash. So, everyone went out there to watch them crash. Instead, though, they successfully flew their plane. And how did people react? People reacted from the point of view that if God intended people to fly, we’d have wings. Nobody that day said, ‘can I get frequent flyer miles.’ And now, this is what people wanna know. What we find is that anything that has to do with commercial aviation, or aviation in general, the Galactic Center has a strong influence, or those things occur when the Galactic Center is prominent. The Galactic Center brings in new ideas, and people have to take the time to adjust and adapt and figure out what the hell it is. So, it’s like, you know, that’s what happens with the Galactic Center. It is a bit alien, and I think that’s one of the reasons that over the course of time, people have been largely not responsive to it. And now, if you go to your handy American Ephemeris, the Galactic Center is in here for the first day of every month.”

    “That’s cool that it’s included in there.”

    “It is cool that it’s included. Neil Michelsen was one of the first to realize that this (the GC) is important. He did a lot to support the basic ideas of the Galactic Center and whatnot. There were several of us that took off on galactic ideas, and we were accused of coming up with a brand of astrology, but by the time the people figured out if it worked or not, we’d be out of town. It was like ‘they came and gave a lecture, and oh, that didn’t work.’ They figured who needs this? They would think something like ‘it (the GC) doesn’t affect us.’ Oh, but it does. Now we are aware that there are these impulses and blasts from space that come in, and they get through our atmosphere more readily now than they used to because of general pollution, and we are being impacted by these things, these energies, and radiations, and they affect us. I kind of see it like the planets in the solar system are crystals, and these energies come through those crystals and beam down. These energies are basically enlightening the crystals if you will and providing us information. One of the things that is difficult about Galactic Astrology now is that, well, if every galaxy has a supermassive black hole at the core, so every degree of the zodiac is a black hole degree. Yes, that would be true. So, people are using that to minimize the importance of it, as opposed to saying there is radiation that’s coming out of these black holes, and now we know the black holes are emanating x-rays and gravitational forces and other things that we don’t have any way of detecting yet. Nonetheless, these energies are coming in. And, oh, by the way, a lot of black holes are going to be rich in radio and will have a broadcasting frequency. In fact, the point that is measured for the Galactic Center is a radio source. Oh, and where is the Galactic Center exactly? It’s at that radio source. The Galactic Center is wide – you’ve got a full degree that it extends – like when you look at the infrared radiation source v the radio source v the ultraviolet emanations, they occur at slightly different degrees. So, when you’re trying to determine where the black hole point is exactly, it’s like it depends on the frequency that you’re examining. If you try to get this down to the minute, it’s not going to work.”

    “Let me ask you, about people who try to discredit Galactic Astrology because there are so many black holes – isn’t there something to be said about the Galactic Center in our galaxy being incredibly important because it’s part of our galaxy? You know what I mean?”

    “Well, yes, but that’s like saying that the Sun is the center of the Solar System. We reference our charts to the Earth. We aren’t looking at the Solar System from a heliocentric model largely – it’s to the Earth. It’s focused on how everything affects the Earth; it’s how everything affects me. So, that is somewhat self-referential, but yes, that is true. The Galactic Center is the steering mechanism for our galaxy, but that is also steered by the Super Galactic Center, at the center of 33 galaxies. Our galaxy, and 32 others, are being drawn towards the Super Galactic Center. The Super Galactic Center is currently at 2-degrees of Libra. Depending on what you say is the center of the Super Galactic Center, you can get readings that are going to vary half a degree. So, there is no exactitude. The gravitational force of that is so strong that you have to figure that it’s going to be affecting 8-degrees on either side of the Super Galactic Center (in a chart). But wait, there’s more. The Super Galactic Center is being pulled by the Great Attractor at 14-degrees Sagittarius, and the Great Attractor appears to be pulled by the Shapley Supercluster (Shapley Attractor), which is at 2-degrees of Scorpio. These are the 4 things that, if you’re going to look at Galactic Astrology, these are the 4 things that you really need to consider. There is a lot of invisibility to anything that is out there in galactic energies. We can look at it and see it, sort of, but more we’re being impacted by its energy. So, people who have contacts to these points are energetically influencing all of the people around them. People that have contacts to the Great Attractor, people automatically assume that they know everything. And these people with Great Attractor contacts are pushed to the center as if they are the source, and the people become satellites around them. People with strong Great Attractor contacts will be pushed to the center of every group that they’re in.”

    “Do you consider the angles conjunct the Great Attractor, too? Or are you only talking about planets?”

    “Yes, angles as well. Angles are points in space, so they don’t have quite the magnitude of planets, but yes, the angles do work.”

    (This would probably be the case for anything that wasn’t a planet. I picked angle here because I have my Ascendant conjunct the Great Attractor).

    “And when we consider, and this is one of my favorite examples of the Shapely Attractor at 2-degrees of Scorpio…well, two people that I can think of that have their Sun conjunct Shapley, one is Hilary Clinton. Like her or not, when she was Secretary of State, she was traveling around the world doing things that affected you and me.”

    “Yeah, that’s very true.”

    “Whether we were aware of it or not. And we weren’t aware of it. We weren’t aware of what she was doing in Africa, we weren’t aware of what she was doing in Indonesia, or North Korea. But she was doing things that impacted us with all of those things. Here’s another one – Bill Gates. He made this thing called Windows, and Windows operates on every PC that’s out there. One of the complaints about Windows is that it has backdoors. Would a Scorpio make anything that had a backdoor? Hell yeah – of course they would. It’s going to get in there and find out all your secrets. There are people complaining about trying to patch up the backdoor, and if you buy an antivirus program that’s from a foreign country, they don’t have the same restrictions for plugging black holes that American companies have, so you get a little more protection from things like that. So invisibly, Bill Gates, you know if you have a PC, he is influencing you.”


    “How wide of an orb do you use for Shapley or any of the galactics mentioned thus far?”

    “It’s like, it’s a curvature, it’s like the diagram of a black hole itself. Around 8-degrees you’re around the event horizon when things become inescapably attracted to the black hole. And then at 4-degrees the force is even stronger. And then at 2-degrees it’s even stronger. If you’re within 4-degrees, I mean, you’re packing a punch with these galactic points.”

    “So, like, my Mars being within 2-degrees of Shapley, would definitely count here?”

    “Your Mars is within 2-degrees of Shapely? I’ve gotta go now, ummm…” (pretends to start getting up and then starts laughing).

    (I’m laughing, too) “Yeah, it is.”

    “That’s how people react, right?”

    “Ummm, they definitely can…. sometimes. Not even necessarily under this kind of context (the influence thing is what I meant here) but sometimes…. yeah.”
    (I often have to keep my Mars in check because that little mother fucker can be something else hahaha)

    “Yeah, there’s that” (laughing).

    “Back to the event horizon thing, would you say the event horizon is around 8 degrees for all the galactic points?”

    “Well, for the event horizon, there is an actual calculable radius that has to do with the gravitational mass of the object, and so there is a radius of how big this thing is. But when they say supermassive, you’ve gotta figure you’ve got 8-degrees you’re going to be feeling the influence. At 4-degrees you’re really going to be feeling the influence. At 2-degrees it’s like have fun with that. Any closer than that and you’re in the thick of it – get the consciousness that this thing is selling or suffer, and life is more difficult than it needs to be…that’s essentially what it is. It’s a little bit like how people react to Saturn and Pluto.”

    “Yeah, it is. I could go on a fucking tangent about that, about how people react to Saturn and Pluto.”

    “Oh, God, yes.” (Laughs) “There are a lot of worthwhile tangents about what people do with astrology where it’s like there is probably a better way of looking at it than that.”

    “So, like, in my research of the Galactic Center and other galactic points, I’ve been using an orb of 10-degrees applying and separating. Does that work?”

    “You’re fine, that works. 8-degrees I rendered as conservative. I mean, you know, when you realize the mass of these things are 300 million times the mass of the Sun….well, how big of an orb are you going to give the Sun?

    “Yeah….I do tend to extend it out.”

    “Some people will give the Sun to the Moon a 12-degree orb.”

    “That’s definitely true – you can extend the orb out…or “can” (in quotes), people can do whatever the hell they want.”

    “And the more massive it is, the bigger the orb can be.”

    “That makes sense.”

    “And so a Galactic black hole technically has more influence than a stellar black hole because it’s just bigger. But stellar black holes are often more interesting.”

    “Are they?”

    “Yeah, so the Cygnus black hole, Cygnus X-3 and Cygnus X-1, they’re stellar black holes, and they define it by the x-ray source – the X is an x-ray source. It’s the first x-ray source in Cygnus, which is at 13-degrees Aquarius, and the third x-ray source in Cygnus is at 28-degrees Aquarius. There is 15-degrees between those x-ray sources in the constellation of Cygnus which is in Aquarius when you translate it down to the ecliptic”

    “I don’t know as much about those but you’re getting me very curious.”

    “The Cygnus X-1, I mean the Sumerians seemed to have Cuneiforms that depicted it as the netherworld. Sort of like a purgatory of sorts. Because when you go into a black hole, you’re invisible. And that’s the complaint that people have that are working with personal planets conjunct the black holes – it’s like they feel like no one can see what they’re doing and thinking. But everyone actually does. Everybody is rejecting it because there is a time warp – other people just can’t get it yet. The massiveness of the object has to do with how long the time warp is. I mean, some of these black holes, you’ll get an idea that doesn’t actually show up for 20 years.”

    “How long do you think the time warp is with the Galactic Center?”

    “I think it’s 9 to 15 months. I’ve done a lot of work with that and I’m pretty confident of those numbers. It’s sort of like, if you told someone your latest insight today, they would scratch their head and walk away from you going ‘Oh, that’s just Ellie being Ellie!’”

    “This actually happens to me! All my fucking life!” (laughs)

    “It happens a lot. They could start taking note of what you said at 6 months. What you (or anyone with Galactic Center conjunctions) need to be doing today is selling your newspaper from 9 months ago. Because what was front page in your consciousness 9 months ago, people now will go ‘ah, that’s a little hard to wrap around, but I see your point. I get it….yeah….I’m getting it.’ And so that’s why you need to be writing this stuff down and memorializing it because you can then go back in time and say ‘okay, I’m going to tell people what I was thinking 9 months ago.’ And they’ll hear you. But if you tell them what you’re thinking today, they won’t get it.”

    “I’ll try that. That’s really funny because that TOTALLY happens to me. And even like what you were saying earlier about how people will think it’s their idea, and it’s like ‘no – I said that already a long time ago, what the hell are you talking about?’”

    “The Galactic Center has a lot to do with intellectual property. You know, the argument for charging for astrology is part of the Galactic Center. People will be like ‘if it’s divine inspiration, then you should give it away.’ Tell my landlord. You know, it’s like you have to go the grocery store, I can’t tell the cashier a Galactic Center insight and get my groceries. You know, that’s sort of an inflation buster, but you know, it’s not going to work. It’s like, there is a real world, and the universe is saying ‘I need people to track and deliver.’ And here’s the thing – like every second Tuesday of the month, Windows gives your PC an update. But that update is not in effect until you download it. It will download automatically if you have your settings right, but it will slow down everything else that you’re doing without you knowing why is my computer so slow today?! Well, there’s an update. It’s being downloaded. And that download, when you’re downloading cosmic forces, is a bit of distraction to the mundane, so there needs to be some time, prioritize, for the downloading in order to grab this. And then you have to install it. Because if you don’t install it, it’s just hanging out there as a downloaded file. It doesn’t take effect until you install and reboot. That’s the metaphor for the Galactic Center. And here’s another Galactic Center thing: I met a taxi driver once, I actually worked with this guy in electronics after I got out of the Navy, and he said, ‘I’ve learned so much shit that I have to forget shit in order to learn new shit.’ That’s technically not true in terms of what we know about brain capacity and storage and that kind of thing, but it is an interesting thing. There is a program on a PC called defrag and it’s good to run it from time to time. Because when you deleted a file or you clear your cache, those things are still sort of present. You have to formally get rid of them, and then you compress your drive. You move things around, so it increases the access time to the information that has stored. The Galactic Center needs to defrag the brain every so often, every 6 months or so. What do you now believe? Delete ideas that you no longer believe and move the ideas that you do believe to where those ideas that you no longer believe used to exist.”

    “Essentially moving shit around.”

    “Your access time is increased. You’re smarter, you’re faster, you’re more accurate, it’s just the way it works. But you have to defrag from time to time. You’ve got to get rid of the junk and you have to increase your access time. When you start doing galactic things, every now and again you’re going to have to sit down by yourself and go okay, I’m going to clear space. You can do this before you go to sleep, you can do this in the shower, you can do this having a cup of coffee staring at butterflies. It doesn’t matter how you do it – you just have to do it. It’s important, especially with the Sagittarian points…there is a lot of stuff in Sagittarius, and why is that? It’s because that’s the center of the galaxy, so everything clusters around there. Sagittarius and Capricorn are the most potent galactic signs in our universe. There is more stuff within the galactic structure in both of those signs. Scorpio and Aquarius would be the next two. But there is more stuff in Sagittarius and Capricorn.”

    (My Sagittarius, Capricorn, Scorpio chart heavy ass is pleased with this– I’m smiling really big)

    “Now you had a question about the opposite side of things.”

    “Yes, about the Super Galactic Center – what opposes it.”

    “And why did you pick the Super Galactic Center for the opposite side?”

    “Because in space we already know there is a Galactic Anti-Center. We already know what that’s like. So, I’m figuring that there has to be something opposing the Super Galactic Center. I just don’t know what it is. Because polarity is such a thing. I know there is something there.”

    “Yeah, it’s like, the best idea, the best thing that I could suggest for understanding the opposite point of the Super Galactic Center is the Book of the Hopi by Frank Waters. The Hopi’s had a myth about the twins who controlled the spin of the Earth in space, and they control the entire polarity in space. Go and read that – it’s a little lofty, but you know if you kind of read it and go ‘hmmmmm’ and put it into the Galactic Center and say ‘help me wrap around this’ it would be okay. There is an antipoint for the Super Galactic Center, but it’s important to look at…. you know, there is cold, dark matter out there in space where there is allegedly nothing, but how to interpret that? I don’t actually know. I am of the point of view that you look where things are, as opposed to looking where things are not. There is a polarity point to the Super Galactic Center, but that’s also a place where you can find a cluster of black holes in Aries. So, what are you feeling over there? Are you feeling the polar opposite of the Super Galactic Center, or are you perceiving these Aries black holes which are telling you ‘you have to get inside yourself, because if you don’t get inside yourself you won’t discover excellence.’”

    “When I think of this particular area, because, you know, knowing what we know about the Super Galactic Center and what it represents, it seems to me…..I call the opposite point to the Super Galactic Center “Blank Space-Space,” like blank ocean space on a map. This name kind of started as a joke with a friend of mine. I was talking about the opposition point to the Super Galactic Center, and he was like ‘oh, like blank ocean space on a map? ‘And I was like ‘you know that kind of fits.’ I have been calling it Blank Space-Space since this is in space and not the ocean. It does seem like, where there might be a lot of fucking around on the fence, compromise, weighing things at the Super Galactic Center to an excessive extent (since the Super Galactic Center is in Libra), at the opposition point there is a lot of just doing and just being.”

    “That’s a point of assimilation. When you’re at the polar opposites, you’re at the point of assimilation. It’s like, I’m gunna step back from that and I’m going to go over here. It’s like a planet comes close to the Sun. Every planet has a closest point to the Sun. Neptune and Venus it’s hard to distinguish the distance of close and far because they have very round orbits, but all the other planets have more of an elliptical orbit. So, when a planet is closest to the Sun, it is feeling the most solar urgency that there is. When a planet goes out to its aphelion (or furthest distance from the Sun) that’s where you sit down and go ‘okay everything that was so damn urgent when I was perihelion, I’m going to absorb this and I’m going to figure it out and I am going to assimilate this in consciousness’. This is the thing about the galactic points – until they are assimilated, it’s just data. It’s a download on your computer that you haven’t done anything with. You haven’t installed the program. And when you install a program, what is the first thing that you do? A good Saturn person is going to go into any program and they’re going to look at all the menu options and see what’s under them. Otherwise, you have access to something that you don’t know how to resource. That’s the problem with a lot of astrological information – there’s not really a factor of assimilation. I was having a conversation with a young astrologer a while ago about how to set up a chart. You lose something when you don’t know how to do that. Cause if you don’t, say, know what Delta T is, you don’t understand how time works. If you go into a big American Ephemerides – it sounds like you’re stuttering when you say that word, or drunk – when you go into that at the very beginning it shows you how to set up a chart, and it explains to you also how to do these things. Do it. If you’ve never set up a chart, learn how to do it, because then you will have an operational awareness of the solar system that you can not fathom by entering the data into a program, clicking it, and seeing the chart. You can create any chart that you want with programs, make up all the fucking shit you want, but unless you have the assimilation of what is operating, you don’t get it. You’re a mechanic with a screwdriver banging on everything to see if it makes a noise when you bang on it. You’re using the wrong end of the screwdriver.”

    “It’s kind of like when you take math classes and they teach you how to solve problems on a calculator, but they never teach you how to do it by hand.”

    “When you have a thunderstorm, if it scares you and you close the curtains, lightning is still happening, and when it strikes near and blows out your power, I’m aware that this storm is affecting me but I can’t see it so therefore I am safe. You can’t pull your head over the covers. It’s like the old story of the person who looked at their transits, and their transits said they’re gunna have a bad day, so they don’t go into work. Their boss calls and wonders why they aren’t at work. They say that their astrology said they were going to have bad transits today, so they better not come to work. And the boss says, ‘you’re fucking right you’re having bad transits; you’re fired.’ So, it’s a little bit like that. This stuff is still influencing you whether you choose to be aware of it or not. The Galactic Center, Super Galactic Center, the Great Attractor, all the black holes out there are part of the energetic matrix that is the universe, and you don’t get to discriminate what you want to include.”

    “Okay – I see what you’re saying.”

    “In more contemporary astrology, Eris demoted Pluto because she’s larger and a little bit more massive, and now they are both called small – they’re too small to be called planets.”

    “Dwarf-planets.”

    “A major city newspaper – and I won’t say which city because one might be able to figure out the astrologer from that – called an astrologer and asked, “how does this impact us now?” And the astrologer said, “I don’t use gravel.”

    “They said what?” (lol I’m confused for a minute)

    “The Kuiper Belt, and the asteroid belt, are gravel.”

    “OH!” (I had a lightbulb moment hahahaha lol duh)

    “Here’s the thing that’s kind of extending off the realm of Galactic Astrology, but it shows stuff. I was doing a mathematical comparison of the characteristics of all of the planets in the solar system when Eris was discovered – mass, density, gravitation, and diameter -I was comparing those things mathematically. And then I was doing logarithmic function comparisons and I was doing stuff and people were like ‘we use logs in astrology’ and it was like ‘not really.’ There was this thing, we used to have log files back in the old days when you set up the chart and the table of houses, but it wasn’t logarithmic in terms of how a mathematician would think of logarithms. Anyway, I found that Eris, Pluto, and Chiron, clustered together, and the terrestrial planets clustered together, the gaseous giants clustered together. Ceres clustered with Pluto, Chiron and Eris.”

    “Really? That’s interesting.”

    “You would think that she would be terrestrial. Well, years ago they flew by Ceres, and they said ‘this is weird – she’s got ice’. Asteroids don’t have ice.” And by the way, Ceres is a planet because when you consider how she operates based on International Astronomical Union stuff on planetary classification, she is a planet. Well okay, she’s a planet. But then when you compare, she aligns with these other points. And by the way, in some of these mathematical analyses, she had more potency than any planet in the solar system.”

    “That’s really interesting.”

    “Now Ceres said to Jupiter ‘If I don’t get my daughter back, I’m going to starve the planet.’”

    “Yeah she did.”

    “Everyone would die. So, Ceres had a lot of deference mythologically. Why did she have so much deference? And Pluto was her thing. Pluto abducted her daughter. Okay, so here’s what the astronomers have concluded: the working model now is that Ceres was once in the Kuiper Belt, she was out by Pluto. And Jupiter who cut the deal in mythology – her daughter spending 6 months with Pluto and 6 months with Ceres, sort of like joint custody – the belief is that Jupiter escorted Ceres away from Pluto and out of the Kuiper Belt and into the asteroid belt. So, the scientific model is consistent with mythology.”

    “Now that’s interesting as hell. I knew about the mythology of Ceres, but I didn’t know about the other stuff.”

    “Yeah, isn’t it? It changes everything. And here’s the thing – astrologers have to keep up with what science is telling us. For instance, I’ve started using the asteroid Psyche. Why? Because astronomers 18 months ago said that if you mine Psyche, it would be worth more than the global economy…if you could mine this asteroid. So, if you mine the Psyche, if you attune to your dream state, if you do the things that Psyche portends according to her mythology, what richness will you uncover? This is important. Astronomers said that Psyche is a very important asteroid. Oh, and the movie Don’t Look Up is the same story. This story, this comet, we’re going to destroy it, we’re going to deflect it, it won’t hit the Earth, the military has got it. And then a techie entrepreneurial guy got in the way and said, ‘I want to mine it – instead we’ll land on it and do these other things, and we’ll extract it’s wealth and resources.’ So, an Elon Musk kind of guy got in the way and fucked up the whole thing. That’s what this movie is about. And, oh by the way, don’t look up, because if you look up and see this awe, you will be impacted – if you don’t look up it’s not there, if you don’t look up the Earth isn’t going to be hit by this comet. I don’t know if you’ve seen that movie, but every astrologer needs to see that movie for that purpose.”

    “I am definitely aware of the movie, but I haven’t seen it.”|

    “It’s terrific – it’s funny, it’s tragic, the acting is great, the dialogue is spot on. Adam McKay also did one of those financial exposes years ago.”

    “Was it The Big Short?”

    “Yeah, The Big Short. And it was like this is what actually happened in 2008 guys, pay attention. Cause it’s going to happen again. And so, he did this movie too. How he was inspired to do it, I don’t know.”

    (I looked up Adam McKay’s chart after this interview. There is no “good” time of birth on file, but his Moon *might* be conjunct the Galactic Center depending on what time he was born. Jupiter Retrograde trine the GC at 25-degrees Leo. Uranus conjunct the Super GC at 25-Virgo. Interesting ^_^)

    “I just did a short film called Meteoric that we just wrapped in April, and we are just now on the festival circuit with it, and it started out with a dashcam video of a meteor coming down in Arizona in 2016 and this guy caught it on film, I got permission from him to use it, and I built a story around it. It’s of two couples who get to the meteorite at the same time. One is an astronomer and his girlfriend, and the other is a cowboy and his girlfriend. The cowboy wants to cut off a hunk of the meteorite and make and engagement ring – I mean, meteorite jewelry is gorgeous – and the astronomer wants to cut it up and see what it’s made of. And the women are going ‘no, you just have to honor this thing and respect it – you have to appreciate it for what it is, which is a gift from the heavens.’ And so here we have gifts from the heavens and if you’re too analytical with your astrology you’re going to dissect things to the point where you’re going to end up telling people what they’re favorite color is…which is useless. Because they already know.”

    “Yeah.” (laughing)

     “It’s like, oh this planet rules orange and it’s on your ascendant, so orange is your favorite color. You know, that’s horseshit. It doesn’t have anything to do with anything. It’s how is that planet and how is it leading your presentation of yourself in life.”

    “Yeah. And also, even more so…. I know not everyone is looking for advice, but it’s like…I can tell you about yourself, but I’d rather help you with things. I guess it just depends on what a person is looking for. What you’re talking about above feels like it turns astrology into a kind of parlor trick.”

    “Yeah, you have to figure that out when you first talk to a person. Like people that want to access their creative forces, or that want to be on a more spiritual path. Other people will come to you with something like I just found out I have a lump, and before I go to the doctor, what is your assessment of the lump? Well, first of all you can’t say because you’re not a medical doctor, but you can say there are times down the road, like, here’s a Saturn time and during this Saturn timeframe you’re likely going to be working on rehabilitation, you’re likely going to be working on healing. The combination of Saturn and Chiron, are you going to get through this? Some of that’s going to depend how well you work with the healing process, and some of it will depend on can you look at your North Node and discern if it’s time for you to go play in the stars? I don’t know, those are things that are “unethical” (air quotes used) for astrologers to do. But the point of astrology is to go ahead and direct people where they are and not where you want them to be.”

    “Yeah – that definitely makes sense.”

    “And astrologers tend to direct them towards, like, you have to have spirulina for breakfast. And it’s like, no, you don’t have to have spirulina for breakfast. I just happened to pick spirulina because it was big a number of years ago and now you never hear anyone talk about spirulina unless they are making a spirulina margarita. Now we’re on to antioxidants, and probiotics, and that probiotics mess with antibiotics. If you’re taking antibiotics, what probiotics should you take. I mean, there’s a whole theory that probiotics are good, and antibiotics are bad. And it’s like, antibiotics aren’t bad if you have an infection.”

    “Yeah, with everything there needs to be a balance.”

    “Yeah, and probiotics and antibiotics are like the Super Galactic Center and whatever opposes the Super Galactic Center. You need both.”

    “Yeah, and the same thing with the Galactic Center and the Galactic Anti-Center.”

    “Yeah. And the important thing to look at is that astrology is evolving because we keep making discoveries. I mean, the Webb telescopes out there are taking great pictures, as I wrote in my SkyScraping last night which people can subscribe to by going to my website, www.philipsedgwick.com – it’s free. A guy cut a slice of Chorizo and photographed it and said here’s the star Proxima Centauri. No! It’s not Proxima Centauri, it’s a slice of Chorizo, you dolt! What are you doing?! But then, on the other hand we have this idea that Ceres used to be in the Kuiper Belt, and the Kuiper Belt is potent, and was theorized 1947 by Gerard Kuiper who was an astronomer from Arizona who was ridiculed for his thinking. It was like you’re nuts! There’s an asteroid belt outside the solar system? No, that’s true. And Mike Brown, who was one of the discoverers of Eris, believes there is a Mars size planet out there.”

    “You know, this is an interesting thing for you to bring up, theorizing planets that might be out there, and I have nothing to actually back this up, it’s just pure, like, whatever (making hand movements like things being downloaded into my mind), but I do have this idea that there are things/planets out there that we can’t see, or we’re not supposed to see yet. Because there are 12 signs in the zodiac it would make sense if there were 12 planets that went along with all 12 signs. Does that make sense?”

    “Yeah, there is that, and there is also physical reality. Like Nibiru, that is pure bullshit.”

    (I agree with that about Nibiru. I’m not exactly sure what I mean when I say the above about planets that you can’t see, but it’s not like the Nibiru stuff that I’ve read about before)

    “There is nothing to that. You know, the diagrams of Nibiru show it orbiting the Earth. Things don’t orbit the Earth because they can’t, they are captured by the Sun, they orbit the Sun. So, if you see a diagram that has something orbiting the Earth – other than the Moon or a possible couple of other things, but they are not Nibiru. People say that Nibiru is 4 lightyears away, and it’s a brown dwarf that we can’t see because it’s a brown dwarf. We can see brown dwarfs – we see them all the time. And it’s 4 lightyears away and it’s going to destroy us on January 1st. Okay, if it’s 4 lightyears away and its traveling at the speed of light, it would take 4 years to get here. That’s not January. It’s like, no, this isn’t true. Mike Brown and I have had a few communications along the way, and I went and saw him lecture when he was at the University of Arizona, and he was absolutely delightful. And I said to him ‘let’s talk about how you name things and what you think it means when you name things’ and he said, ‘oh I’d love to, but I can’t – nobody would ever take me seriously again if I sat down with you, or any astrologer for that matter.’ I asked Mike Brown about Nibiru just because at the time it was coming up a lot again, it’s always come up and it’s not there. It’s like get over being the kid at the campfire who has a scary story to tell, and everyone wanted to go to bed before you had your turn. Don’t be that person. Don’t be the one who is disseminating this information, doomsday information, that has no validity. And yet, it keeps coming up. Just like Mars when it was at perihelion and it was closest to Earth a number of years ago, and it was larger than it has ever been seen. Every time Mars gets near perihelion again this surfaces on twitter and Facebook that Mars is as close as it’s ever been for 20,000 years – no! That’s not true. That’s the regurgitation of a previous post. And oh, by the way, people who have gotten caught up in Q Anon have also gotten caught in the algorithm and the algorithms won’t let you free. So that consciousness is like an internet algorithm – you have to clear your cache and get rid of the algorithm, you have to wipe out that account because you’re never going to be free…they got you. And they are going to steer like a gravitational object in space, they are going to steer you where they want you to be. Until you clear that and decompress, your conscious processing isn’t going to improve – you’re still going to believe this stuff. You know, we’ve been watching the X-Files, and a lot of this is like ‘UFO’s exist.’ And then other stuff is combined with metaphysics, psychics, astrologers, etc. And it is an expose of how ridiculous people sound in this realm. And we have to be the people who don’t sound ridiculous – we have to be the people who actually understand the science. We need to understand gravity, and emanations, and that these impact us. We also can’t isolate and say, well this counts and this doesn’t. It all counts. It’s all there. In terms of being “New Age” you have to be able to integrate the latest that science is doing. You have to know what the objects are at the edge of our solar system. And oh, if you never use Eris, you are never going to be able to do Galactic Astrology. If you won’t include that, how can you include the galactic stuff? If you still don’t think of Ceres as a planet, then you won’t be able to do Galactic Astrology because you haven’t expanded the consciousness sufficiently to say I need to include this. Should everything be considered? If you could everything should be considered, but you can’t. So, what the astrologer does – okay so when I do a reading for someone, there are transits that I don’t discuss. If they aren’t relevant to where that person is right now it would be a distraction to say ‘well, you have this…’ but they can’t hear that yet. So, what you can do is position the person to get through the immediate circumstances, usually mundane, that are impeding their ability to look beyond, you can work them through that, and then when they come back around you can bring up the other things. Our job is to be relevant to the need of the client and not to the desires of our ego.”

    “That totally makes sense. In that kind of context also, because it IS hard to include everything, because it can be overwhelming if you do, both to the astrologer and the client. Are there certain other things that you will ALWAYS look at in a chart, always bring into play?”

    “I always bring in Eris. And the reason I always bring in Eris is that everyone feels that they are an outsider.”

    “This is true.”

    “Virtually everyone alive right now was born with Eris in Aries, unless you were born 1922, 1923, unless you’re 100 years old you have Eris in Aries. Everyone on the planet feels like they are being cast out. They can’t get their time at the trough. Everyone is feeling shut out. I always bring up Eris and I always bring it up from the standpoint of what can you do to be part of the things that you want. Eris has the North Node in perihelion in Libra and Taurus, both Venus ruled. What do you need financially? Not everyone has to be rich in America. What you need is enough money that you don’t have to think about it. You don’t need so little that you have to think about it obsessively, or so much that you think about it obsessively because those are out of balance with Eris. But if you’re in a zone, the Goldilocks Zone, where the porridge is perfect, then great. The same thing with social standing, and the same in terms of what you need in relationship (the Libra component of it). When you consider that Eris and social media, they were really hot at the time that Eris was discovered and named. This is when ‘I am included,’ and ‘I am liked’. ‘Oh, but wait – I’m unfriended? Someone just broke up with me that I don’t know? And they sent me a couple of pixels that said you suck? Oh my god, I’m ruined.’ And that’s Eris. Social media is Eris. And influencers? They are Eris gone wrong.”

    (I laugh because the notion of influencer is such a bunch of bullshit hahahahahah)

    “You’re not influencing those people. They can’t feel your aura, they can’t feel the extent of what you’re doing. You’re posting on the internet for God’s sake. Maybe someone like Jon Stewart can go ahead and start a campaign to go ahead and get the Smoke Pit Veterans campaign passed in congress which he just did this week. But it was more than him posting – he got out there and he said things, he was in Washington, he got out there and engaged. Yes, he had a social media campaign because he has millions of followers because of who he is and where he’s been, and he used that. But more, he got out there and engaged with it in order to make the impact that he needed to make. That’s Eris integration. I’m doing life.”

    “Yeah, actually fucking doing something.”

    “That’s a huge thing, so Eris is something that I always consider.”

    “I’m curious, anything else that you always consider when you look at a chart?”

    “I always look at where Saturn and Pluto are operating and what they are stirring up. If a person is having a reading, generally, people don’t come and have readings when everything is great. Occasionally that’s true, but that’s like 3% of the time. It’s like I just want a cosmic polishing, I just want to buff up my North Node – you hear that occasionally. Now-a-days I always look at Psyche. And I always look at Psyche because it’s like what are you dreaming and what are your dreams telling you that agree with or disagree with the circumstances that you feel like you want in life. Is there a way to kind of get into the consciousness of your dream state which is unfettered by life. You dream what you dream – it’s weird stuff.”

    “Things just kind of come through or they don’t.”

    “Yeah, there are insights. About the time that I read this article about Psyche I had a dream about an astronomer doing a podcast of the Galactic Center and being bothered by mosquitos. So, he set up a bug zapper, and every time the bug zapper acquired the matter of a mosquito, it’s energy and influence got larger. The bug zapper became a black hole because of what it was killing and eating. So, this was the premise of the story. I dreamt this, and I woke up and I thought that’s a movie! That movie is called Zap and got into 55 film festivals across the world.”

    “That’s awesome!”

    “And I dreamt that. And it then connected me with these people, this person, and that person – and it was from a dream. Not everyone is going to be a film maker, but somebody might get an idea of you know, I’m designing this microchip and I’m trying to cover up the supply chain issue, and we’re having a problem with our IO devices blowing out, and we’re having a problem with the current distribution past that point, and by the time it gets to the CPU….huh?! What if we positioned it here instead of there, and oh! That might work! And a person dreams this, and they take it to work, and they say what if we took this particular component and moved it in just a little bit? It’s like, okay, because this might solve this heating problem that we’re having. Now, heating is a big deal with chips because they run so hot. It’s like, this could be dreamt. The idea for an astrology book. The idea for the great American novel. The idea for the final clue for the New York Times crossword puzzle. All could be dreamt. Anything can be dreamt – it’s an unlimited access, and per what the astronomers told us if you find Psyche – who appears in our dreams – and find Eros – the love of your life that you can only have in the dream state – you can access that consciousness only the dream state, but you need to learn how to bring it back. It’s like going into a black hole, the experience you have when you say ‘I’m going to tap into Cygnus x-3 and I’m going to hang out for a while and I’m going to learn everything I need to know about consciousness’, you will. But when you come back, you can’t bring that with you. It’s in you, it has been assimilated and integrated in that altered state, but you cannot explain what happened to you. You can only BE it. You have to resonate through every fiber of your being the consciousness that you have assimilated. That’s how Galactic Astrology works.

    “How do you think are some of the best ways to tap into the Galactic Center, the Super Galactic Center, the Great Attractor, the Shapley Attractor, etc.? This question would be for people that have conjunctions to the GC and other galactic points, and even people that don’t. My thought that is if people have conjunctions to these things, they are probably able to tap into the energy more (or more easily), but I do think anyone can tap into this whether they have conjunctions or not.”

    “Yes, anyone can. And the first thing that you have to do is clear conscious space that is completely blank, and not personalize it. Don’t personalize it. Like, if you say I’m looking for a new job and you say ‘Galactic Center, how do I find a new job?’ What you do is you reach out to the Galactic Center and you say what can be said to someone who’s college education is no longer providing a fulfilling range of employment, and they want to pursue something different? What can be said to that person? And then the information that comes in – 2 things about that: it’s not personal and because it’s not personal you won’t reject it. Like, if I looked at your chart and said ‘Ellie, you know what you need to do?’ You’re going to sit there and you’re going to think who the fuck is this? How does he know what I need to do? I’ve been a cosmic girl, I’ve been in Austin, I’ve been drinking my Shiner Bock every night—”

    “That IS my favorite beer, by the way!”

    “Ah! How did I know that?! I know what they drink in Austin.”

    (Laughs and nods head in agreement hahahahaha)

    “It wasn’t a psychic phenomenon, it’s like what everybody drinks there. But the information can give a jarring feeling. A lot of times, and I’ve probably done this, said to people that you must integrate the Galactic Center, and people go oh what do you know? I’m sure I’ve said that a time or 6000 along the way. And it does alienate but you’ve got to step outside of yourself and be at the point where you’re not reacting to it as a person, but you’re reacting to it as a consciousness. Those are separate things.”

    “I think I get what you mean – I’m pretty sure that I do.”

    “Cool, good.”

    “I might put this next question up closer to where we talked about Shapley, but there is the Dipole Repeller that’s opposite Shapley. Do you ever work with that?” (I decided not to move the question lol).

    “No.”

    “No?”

    “I work with where it is.”

    “Where it is, you mean around 2-degrees Taurus?”

    “Yeah because you know there are other things – you are gunna find that whenever you’re looking at a specific degree, you’re gunna find stuff that’s out there. And so, I work with where it is. If it is galactic and relevant to our system and impacts the rotation of where we are, as does the Galactic Center and the Super Galactic Center, I consider the opposite points. But these things that don’t steer the galaxy in a rotational manner – they pull the galaxy; they aren’t affecting the rotation…well they are affecting the rotation but they aren’t directly involved in the rotation – I don’t consider the opposite points. So, it’s a matter of if the system rotates within itself organically I will consider the opposite point. But then it’s like saying if you have a conjunction to any galactic point, an opposition to any galactic point, or square to any galactic point, it’s extraordinarily relevant.”

    “Thanks for answering that. I just wanted to know if that was a rabbit hole that I needed to go down.”

    “No, I don’t think that one is a rabbit hole (the Dipole Repeller). I think that if you got out there and started playing with Shapley you would be in a rabbit hole enough. There is a website called an atlas of the universe, and you can look at perspectives on there. You can look at these galactic things from different perspectives/lightyears away. It will shift your consciousness. It will be the kind of thing that will cause you to comprehend the entire sphere of things in a way that’s really, really helpful.”

    “I will definitely check this out.”

    “I’m going to have to jump off because I have to get on another zoom call, but I totally appreciate you doing this, and you’re hanging in there and finding a way so we’re not on YouTube.”

    “I totally understand.”

    “So, I appreciate your willingness to do the workaround, and all of that, and I’m assuming that you get my SkyScraping– I sent one out last night.”

    “I did get it – I have not read it yet, but I did get it.”

    “And I do have The Galactic Trilogy, which has a better assimilation of The Astrology of Deep Space and The Astrology of Transcendence. If you like those books, they are only out of print, you can’t get them anymore, they will not go back into print.”

    “Hold on – let me show you something” (looking for books on my table – comes back to the screen holding The Astrology of Transcendence).

    “Oh, well that’s well worn.” (laughs)

    “Yeah, I found it online! And then wait – there’s more!” (Proceeds to hold up The Astrology of Deep Space).

    “Ah! You have the other one, too! Great painting on that one, right?”

    “Yes, it is! This one (The Astrology of Deep Space) was really expensive online – people were charging $200 to $300 for it. And then somebody put it up on eBay for $32 and I was like SOLD. I bought it immediately.”

    “Yeah, I know. And of course, when you buy a book like that the writer gets no royalty, which is one of my favorite parts about the resale.”

    “Yeah, that part kind of sucks.”

    “Especially when they gouge.”

    “Yeah, the gouging is fucked. Just know that with this particular one, there was no gouging.”

    “Yeah that seems pretty flush with what it would probably cost. The Galactic Trilogy has three books in it – a book on heliocentric astrology, a book on basic astronomy for astrologers, and it has The Astrology for the Soul which has a huge chapter on black holes. The black holes that I have been able to research information about. It also has a huge section on the Kuiper Belt objects. It’s a must read. Oh, and you’ll also get an ephemeris for the named objects once I get the data for them, and I do update these. And there is a galactic ephemeris of thousands and thousands of points. You’ll have thousands of pages of information and data and it’s all in PDF. And there is a font that’s not particularly Mac friendly but there is a font that you can use astrologically that I designed to go with this. There is just more stuff in there than you can shake a stick at. I guarantee that if you have insomnia, this is the cure. You will have something useful that you can do at night.”

    “You know, when I can’t sleep, I do like to research. I’m thinking, if I can’t sleep, I might as well be doing something useful.”

    “People can reach out to my website (www.philipsedgwick.com) or they can email me at info@philipsedgwick.com. If you’re interested in The Galactic Trilogy, I can send you an invoice and get that to you – it’s a lot of stuff but it’s a deal.”

    “Seriously, thank you so much for coming on here and talking with me.”

    “Thank you, this was enjoyable. I’m sure you’ll be in touch.”

    “Yeah! I will for sure let you know when I’ve transcribed it and have it up on my blog.”

    “I’m going to head off but thank you again. I’m sure I’ll be hearing from you.”

    “Thank you for being here – and oh, you will!”

    **If you want to subscribe to my website, leave me a comment on the site and it will give you the option to subscribe ^_^ and if you would like for me to read for you, that can be done here.

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part XXII

    **Here is a video that I made about the same thing, for all of you that would rather watch than read**

    I haven’t done any percentages lately about different things I’ve been looking at in regards to the Galactic Center (things that feel like they tie in with the GC but seem to function as a “amplifier” to the GC for people who are already inclined to the way that the GC functions). So, lol, I figured I would do a post about THIS very thing and show what I’ve come up with THUS far.

    I have talked about Jupiter Retrograde throughout this whole study and how I feel like it has a natural affinity with the way that the GC functions. Jupiter (retrograde or direct) has a tie with the GC energy since the GC falls in Sagittarius, but Jupiter Retrograde does feel like it has a special place here. I decided to take Mercury Rx out of this (in the original percentages I was lumping Jupiter Rx and Mercury Rx shit together which I shouldn’t have done). I haven’t fucked with Mercury Rx this go around (though I’m sure I will in future percentage calculations). Instead, this time around I was looking for the percentage of people who have Jupiter Rx (or were born during the shadow period) and/or Jupiter involved with the GC in some way (via conjunction, opposition, trine, or even the square….though I’m still not quite sure WHAT to do with the squares yet). The percentage that I came back for this was 63% – meaning 63% of people have Jupiter Rx (or born in the shadow period) and/or have Jupiter (direct or Rx) making one of the aspects mentioned before to the GC (and the planet conjunct the GC). I found that 37% of participants do not have Jupiter Rx (or born under the shadow period) and don’t have Jupiter making an aspect to the planet conjunct the GC or to the GC itself.
    To break this down even further:
    -69% of these people have Jupiter Rx (or were born during the shadow period)
    -31% of these people have Jupiter (either direct or Rx) making an aspect to the GC and planet conjunct the GC.

    To keep going with the Jupiter thing for a minute, I wanted to look and see how many people had aspects between Jupiter and Chiron, Jupiter and Saturn, and Jupiter and Uranus in their charts. The bounds for this part of the study are simple – it didn’t matter if Jupiter is direct or Rx, or if any of these objects mentioned make contacts with the GC. Since everyone in the study will have SOMETHING conjunct the GC (so far, anyway), I was just curious what the different contacts looked like between these planets (and asteroid) across the different charts. The aspects that I was taking into consideration here are the conjunction, trine, sextile, opposition, square, and quincunx.
    **Jupiter/Chiron Aspects**
    -66% of people in the study thus far have Jupiter making an aspect with Chiron
    -34% of people in the study thus far did not have Jupiter making an aspect with Chiron
    **Jupiter/Saturn Aspects**
    -57% of people in the study thus far have Jupiter making an aspect with Saturn
    -43% of people in the study thus far don’t have Jupiter making aspect with Saturn
    **Jupiter/Uranus Aspects**
    -61% of the people in the study thus far have Jupiter making an aspect with Uranus
    -39% of the people in this study thus far don’t have Jupiter making an aspect with Uranus

    Bringing up the topic of aspects for just a second, I think in the next go-around of percentages to see where things stand, I will be looking at some minor aspects (like the septile, noville, vigintile, etc.). Specifically, I think I will probably focus on the planet (or planets) conjunct the GC and if that planet also happens to make one of these more minor aspects with another planet in the chart.

    I also took a look at Chiron – both to see how many people have Chiron direct and Chiron Rx and to see how many people have Chiron making an aspect to the GC (conjunction, trine, opposition, and square are what I was looking at here). This is what I came back with:
    -50% of people have Chiron Rx SOMEWHERE in the natal chart (doesn’t have to be involved with the GC). The other 50% of people have Chiron direct.
    -54% of people have Chiron (either direct or Rx) making one of the aspects mentioned above to the GC.
    -46% of people have Chiron (either direct or Rx) NOT making one of the aspects mentioned above to the GC.
    –Chiron here should be thought of an an amplifier for the GC energy. While it’s energy certainly ties in with the GC, I think in order for Chiron (direct or Rx) to amplify the GC, something needs to be conjunct or opposite the GC in the first place. I would think that Chiron Rx would serve as a greater amplifier in these cases, since Rx energy ALSO seems to have an affinity for the GC.

    Retrograde planets were the next thing that I wanted to revisit. I looked at these from a couple of different angles, the first of which being the charts of people I would consider to be “retrograde heavy.” When I think of a retrograde heavy chart, I think of someone who has their chart ruler retrograde, or someone who has 3 or more planets retrograde in their chart (things like this make me think “ah, this person has a retrograde heavy chart”). Since everyone in the study thus far has a planet conjunct the GC, I was curious how many of these people would be considered Rx heavy. This is what I came up with:
    -60% of people have retrograde heavy charts
    -40% of people don’t have retrograde heavy charts (even if they have one or two planets retrograde somewhere)
    –I was curious to see how many retrograde heavy people may have been drawn to take part in this research, lol, since there does seem to be an affinity between retrograde planets and the GC.
    From here I wanted to look at the percentage of people who have a retrograde planet conjunct the GC. I have mentioned before some thoughts about this; while the GC seems to have an affinity for retrograde energy, I do wonder WHAT happens to planets conjunct the GC that are retrograde. Does this amplify the retrograde feeling of the planet, or does it do something along the lines of “turning” the planet direct? I could see either of these being a possibility. These are the numbers I came back for this:
    -68% of people had only direct planets (or a direct planet) conjunct the GC
    -32% of people had at least one retrograde planet conjunct the GC

    I also wanted to look at planets Out of Bounds, and how many people have Out of Bounds planets in their natal charts (since I do think that OOB planets might amplify the energy of the GC IF there is already a planet conjunct the GC, or opposing the GC). These are the numbers that I came up with:
    -28% of people have NO Out of Bounds planets in their chart
    -72% of people have at least 1 planet OOB in their chart
    –From the percentage of people that have at least one planet OOB, I broke this down further:
    -48% of people have 1 planet OOB
    -42% of people have 2 planets OOB
    -10% of people have 3 planets OOB
    -No participants had more than 3 planets OOB
    From there I wanted to look and see how many people had their OOB planet (or planets) conjunct the GC. For this, all the planets that someone has OOB didn’t have to be conjunct the GC (I was just looking to see if at least one OOB planet was conjunct the GC for the cases of people having multiple OOB planets). Here are the numbers I found:
    -79% of people that have OOB planets have at least one OOB planet conjunct the GC
    -21% of people have OOB planets that make no conjunction to the GC

  • Galactic Center Thoughts part XVI or: a brief introduction to the SUPER GALACTIC CENTER

    Here is the video that goes into the Super Galactic Center (if you are more of watcher than a reader). If you would like for me to read for you (Galactic stuff or otherwise), you can have me do that here.

    I wanted to type up something quickly about the Super Galactic Center, to at least acknowledge its presence. I wasn’t really going to even get into the Super GC yet, but I felt like it was time for it to be mentioned, especially with more people asking when squares to the GC will be explored. The Super GC ties into the squares with the GC because of where it is located in the chart – right now it is at 2-degrees Libra. This is within the window of orb that I would be looking at for squares to the GC. The Super GC does appear to move more quickly than the GC does – for instance, when I was born in November 1987, the Super GC was at 29-Virgo (so that it does seem to move more quickly than the GC does, which was between 26 & 27-degrees Sagittarius for most of the 20th Century).

    To pull the super GC in your chart, go to astro.com and create your natal chart. Then go to “extended chart selection.” Once there, go down to where it says “additional objects” and find the “list of fixed stars” (and click on it). Go down the list until you get to the G’s and find the option listed as “Gal.Pole, GPol” and pick it. Then pull your chart again and you will see where the Super GC is in your chart.

    The notion of the Super GC existing, and how to read it alongside the GC in our galaxy (or even if it should be read alongside the GC of our galaxy) definitely has me thinking and theorizing and trying to make sense of shit. This is why I’m hesitant to start looking at the squares to the GC since those most definitely beg questions about the Super GC and how to integrate this into the mix (since planets, etc. that conjunct the Super GC and square the GC that happen to fall in Virgo and Libra would definitely be impacted here). It also begs the question of something like a Super Galactic Anti-Center – does something like this exist? I figure SOMETHING must exist opposite the Super Galactic Center, but I can’t find anything about that (though, to be fair, I haven’t done a substantial amount of searching on that subject yet). For these reasons, the squares might be the last piece of the GC puzzle that I’ll be looking at (I’m not 100% firm on this, but I could see it playing out this way).

    There are also questions about HOW to even READ and WEAVE the Super GC into all of this to begin with. The Super GC isn’t even in this galaxy which makes me wonder if it should be read alongside the GC at all (or incorporated in a different way). THIS is DEEP SPACE astrology shit and I’m trying to make sense of exactly how to incorporate it into regular chart reading. I mean, the GC is part of OUR galaxy so it does make sense to incorporate it into regular chart reading. The Super GC though? I almost get the sense that while it can be read in the natal chart like other things in our galaxy, it might signify something else all together as well. What that is? Lol I have some theories but nothing super firm yet.
    -My friend Chris made the comment a while back that, perhaps, the Galactic Center of our galaxy is like an umbilical cord to something (other dimensions, other realms, The Creator itself, etc.). This got me thinking in terms of the Super GC, and that maybe the GC of our Galaxy is like the umbilical cord that ties us to the Super Galactic Center of the metagalaxy (and the metagalaxy/super cluster of galaxies has been given the name Laniakea.)
    -If we think about it THIS way (the way mentioned above), then maybe the GC is tied to the Super GC, but they are almost on different “planes” or “levels” or something? Like while maybe they can be read together, they do need to be separated in some way (since one is in our galaxy and the other is in the metagalaxy and so far from our galaxy).
    -Even if they aren’t separated by way of the chart, and both the GC and the Super GC are read together, I think it might be important to think about the Super GC as if it exists “somewhere else,” even if reading it alongside everything in the chart. I’m still trying to make sense of exactly HOW I’m thinking about this, lol.

    I have the knee jerk inclination to think that stuff conjunct the Super GC is probably important on it’s own (regardless if someone has anything also conjunct the GC or not). As I have mentioned before, I do think people who have GC conjunctions (or even oppositions, or BOTH) probably are more tuned into the GC, albeit in different ways depending on what the contacts are. I might think that conjunctions to the Super GC function in the same way – making the person more “galactically inclined” in the way that conjunctions to the GC seem to function. I wouldn’t be surprised if the galactic links are a little different (and maybe even a little further OUT into deep space) when you see conjunctions to the Super GC. This will all have to be fleshed out further over time, but yeah, I do think stuff conjunct the Super GC is probably really important. And the squares between stuff conjunct the GC and the Super GC seem like they would be incredibly important – really pushing the person to embrace their galactic inclinations, perhaps?

    I decided to look at how many people in the Galactic Center research so far have squares to the GC. Even though I’m not sure exactly HOW the oppositions to the Super GC function, I’m including them in this tally, too. I’m not really sure what to do WITH this tally, lol, but I figure “what the hell – let’s see anyway.”
    -Just for reference, I would be looking for anything conjunct the super GC within 10-degrees applying or separating. Same thing for the opposition to the Super GC (I know that mother fucker means something).
    -I came back with 53% of participants of the research so far having SOMETHING conjunct the Super GC in Virgo/Libra.
    -I came back with 48% of participants of the research so far having SOMETHING conjunct what MIGHT be like the Super Galactic Anti-Center.
    –Keep in mind that all of these people also have GC conjunctions and/or oppositions.
    –Both of these findings definitely make me want to dip my feet into this sooner than later, hahahahaha.

  • Some thoughts on how to bring the Galactic Center shit “down to Earth.”

    Just as a disclaimer – this is literally JUST an idea, I’m just fucking around with this shit and am in no way, shape, or form claiming that this is “correct,” or that I am any kind of expert in this particular area of astrology (I won’t do myself dirty/sell myself completely short though – I have a lot of astrological knowledge in MANY areas of astrology, but this particular are, the Galactic Center (GC), is more of a “mystery” to me). I also reserve the right to to find this wrong later on…so, in other words, no one hold me to this shit 🤪Without playing around with ideas and theories and stuff like that, we wouldn’t ever learn anything new.

    In the intro article that I wrote about the Galactic Center (GC), I mentioned the idea of bringing stuff FROM the GC “down to Earth.” In case I didn’t make it clear WHY this would be necessary in the first place (sometimes I’m not as clear as I would like to be 🤣), there is an idea that the GC is the source of all creation, and a life-line to the “other side” (or other realms, other dimensions, etc.). There is also an idea that the GC is a way to tap into this source of all creation, to tap into other dimensions, and even to be FED information from the source of all creation and/or from other dimensions. Why would this need to be brought “down to Earth?” Because the GC, I would think, could feed people some really weird shit that may not make a whole bunch of sense, and almost needs to be translated into our language here on Earth (the GC seems like it speaks a language all its own). EVERYBODY has the GC in their natal chart, meaning EVERYBODY has this potential in their chart. I won’t lie, though – the propensity to be really connected to the GC does seem like this would be the strongest with people who have planets conjunct the GC (and probably even planets opposite the GC, albeit in a different way). Currently, the GC is at 27-degrees 3-minutes Sagittarius (or 27 Sagittarius 03), but it moves VERY SLOWLY like a fixed star (it’s not a fixed star, but it moves LIKE one), meaning you will need to pull the GC in your own chart to know exactly where it was when you born.

    In the intro to the GC article, I mentioned that there is the Galactic Center (GC), and then there is the Galactic Anti-Center (GaC) which is opposite the GC (right now the GaC is at 27 Gemini 03). I also mentioned that scientifically the Earth is 2/3 of the way from the GC, and 1/3 of the way from the GaC (this may or may not be a rough or crude estimation) – Earth is definitely closer to the GaC than the GC. In knowing ALL of this, in regards to this theory I’m playing with, we’d be looking for the place in the chart where the 2/3 and 1/3 point meet.

    There are 360-degrees in a natal chart. Having the GC and GaC opposing each other, we are looking at two different sections of the chart with 180°. Here is an example of what I’m talking about:

    So, we might theoretically be looking at two spots where the GC information could be brought down to Earth since we’d be looking at one point on the lower half of the chart and another point on the upper part of the chart. In doing the math here, 180 divided by 2/3 you get 120 and 180 divided by 1/3 you get 60. This would put this theoretical point where you could bring information down to earth 60-degrees from the GaC and 120-degrees from the GC on either part of the chart. Since the GC is currently at 27 Sagittarius 03, this would make these points 27 Aries 03 and 27 Leo 03 right now (and from the windows of degrees from 17 Aries 03 to 07 Taurus 03 and 17 Leo 03 to 07 Virgo 03. For example, in my natal chart the GC was at 26 Sagittarius 41 when I was born, so this would make the precise location of the points in my chart 26 Aries 41 (in the 4th House) and 26 Leo 41 (in my 9th House), and would make these windows from 16 Aries 41 to 06 Taurus 41 and 16 Leo 41 to 06 Virgo 41. You would need to see where the GC was when you were born to find the precise location for this in your own chart.

    What I think might be really important here is if one has planets conjunct this particular degree, or within a certain window of degrees, to be able to bring the stuff one gets fed from the GC down to Earth. I would use a wider orb here – maybe something like 10-degrees on either side….or that’s what I’m starting out with regarding this theory (casting a wide net like with the initial GC research on reddit). This would put this window from 16 Aries 41 to 6 Taurus 41 and from 16 Leo 41 to 6 Virgo 41 based on my own chart – depending on where exactly the GC was when you were born this might be a little different “minutes” wise.

    These windows of degrees in the chart seem, at the moment, where all the shit from the GC could be translated down to Earth. If one has conjunctions to the GC, but no planet (or the Sun/Moon Midpoint, Chiron, cardinal points, etc.) within that window of degree, they might be given a ton of information from the GC but never be able to translate or transmute that information down to Earth in a way that makes sense to them or anyone else. Luckily, there are two windows of degree for this (as of now I’m rolling with this, anyway), meaning it seems like there would be a better chance that something in the chart would fall within those windows.

    This also brings the question of planets trine the GC to the forefront of my mind (since these windows of degree are essentially trine the GC). It probably plays in and plays out the strongest when looking at someone who has planets conjunct the GC (maybe even opposing the GC), and something trine it to bring that information down to Earth. The people that just have the trines to the GC but no conjunctions – they are able to translate (or transmute) the GC energy down to earth more easily, maybe, but they might not be as familiar with where that energy comes from if they don’t have a planet conjunct the GC as well (meaning they may not really know what they are able to translate in the first place). It does seem like a planet (or whatever) falling within these windows of degrees could serve as a filter for bringing the stuff the GC feeds someone down to Earth – it could be used as a vehicle this way. The closer the planet (or whatever) is to the actual exact points, 60-degrees on either side of the GaC and 120 degrees from the GC, the better this planet serves as vehicle for bringing shit down to Earth.

    Definitely play around with this and I’d love to hear any thoughts that anyone has. I will probably make a video about this over the weekend and link it to this post, lol.

    To find the GC in your own chart, go to astro.com and under the fixed star list (once you’ve picked the extended chart selection at the top, you will go the to the bottom where it says “additional objects” after entering your information). Go down to the G’s and pick the option that says “Gal. Center, SgrA*.” Then run the chart 🙂

    Here is YouTube video that kind of goes along with all of the above ^_^ and if you would like for me to read for you, you can book a reading with me here 🙂

  • A Light Introduction to the Magic of the Galactic Center

    A Light Introduction to the Magic of the Galactic Center

    I have never written about the Galactic Center, but it has been a focus of mine and on my radar for well over a year and a half (probably closer to two years at this point). Natalie (my partner in crime) and myself have tossed around ideas about the Galactic Center (the GC) – even during the process of creating the Star Cards, we would still toss around ideas about the GC here and there. So, earlier this year after the release of the Star Cards, we put out a “call” to anyone who might have planets conjunct or opposite the Galactic Center. For anyone who is interested about the original post on our subreddit, r/letsfuckwithastrology, you can find that by clicking this.

    Why did I post that here? Because this post actually gives a decent over-view of where our minds were at the time that we put out this “call” to anyone who may have planets conjunct the GC or opposing the GC. Also, the post tells you how to pull the GC on your own chart. It isn’t a fixed star, but it moves very, very slowly like a fixed star moves – currently it is at roughly 27-degrees Sagittarius. Below you will find my chart with the GC pulled so you can get an idea of what the symbol will look like when you pull it in your own chart.

    Galactic Center (circled in yellow). Something weird happened to the formatting of the picture; ignore how weird it looks.

    The Galactic Center is in the cluster fucked 1st House, where the symbol “*Gala 26 41” is in the house. So….for reasons that you can see from the chart, the Galactic Center, and understanding it better, are VERY personal to me.

    The Galactic Center is thought to be several things – a lifeline or phoneline to other dimensions (to the great unknown), the source of all creation, a place from where “divine” information comes from, and other magical things. The reddit user u/6footsiren put it beautifully when they called the GC a “command center” – this definitely feels like a very apt way to think of it. Mayan’s called the GC, the center of our galaxy, “Hunab Ku” which they considered to be the supreme Godhead. The Mayan’s seemed to work quite a bit with the GC from an astrological perspective, but it isn’t as worked with across the board in the astrological community today….which, I think, should be changed. Scientifically, the Galactic Center is a super-massive black hole in the center of our galaxy (our Sun orbits the GC, so some have theorized that the GC is like a “hidden” luminary in the chart). There is a radio source that is found to come from the GC (which is why it has the name Sagittarius A – that’s what the source is called) that was discovered in 1974….which, lol, is weird (this radio source is particularly “bright” and “complex”… and coming from the center of our galaxy). It is hidden from the human eye due to all the space dust and other shit that is obscuring it from view, though the GC itself is not hidden from the human eye.

    When I found out about the GC a long time ago, it didn’t catch my attention the way it did about two years ago (I guess it wasn’t the time for it to catch my attention a long time ago). But once it really caught my attention, it REALLY caught my attention (and caught Natalie’s attention, too) and got us thinking about the nature of black holes in general. I’m not going to use the correct word here, but they do something like “suck” things into them….and once that something in space is sucked into them, they are fundamentally changed. They go through a process of spaghettification that pulls the object vertically and horizontally, completely changing the object in question. This then got us thinking……is that what happens to planets in the natal chart when they are conjunct the GC? Obviously the planet isn’t falling into a black hole in real life, but in terms of the natal chart it seems like having planets conjunct the GC would fundamentally CHANGE them (and actually here I’m thinking this change could be more like a “CHARGE”). There is just something SO Uranian about the GC as it is (to me the GC feels very Uranian in the way that retrograde planets and out of bounds planets tend to have an affinity to Uranian energy ). There is also something very Plutonian about the GC as well, the “transformative” aspect of it.

    On the other side of the sky is the Galactic Anti-Center, which is next to a very bright star and is a much “calmer” area of the galaxy over all. There is a lot of space dust going in this area, which makes me wonder if the brightness of the star Elnath (which is close to the anticenter) and the space dust might cause planets opposite the GC to be “fogged” over – harder to access in some way, harder to “see” in real life. I have seen the anti-center as theorized as where the information from the GC can be brought down to “Earth.” I can see that train of thought, and have played around with it myself, but from a scientific point of view, it doesn’t quite make sense. The Anti-Center is 1/3 distance from Earth, and the GC is 2/3 of the way from Earth (that’s probably a really crude estimate, but you get the idea)….which makes me think that where the information from the GC is brought down to Earth is actually at the point in the chart where the 2/3 and 1/3 meet. This is also the place where any planets opposite the GC are best able to be seen.
    **Since the GC is thought of as a phoneline to other dimensions, there is a theory that the GC gives people information from “somewhere else,” and other things along those lines. While I think this is possible for anyone, I do think it’s probably stronger for those with actual planets/cardinal points/etc. conjunct the GC.
    ******I’m very on the fence about the Galactic Anti-Center, and what it actually DOES mean. I KNOW it means SOMETHING, just not totally sure WHAT (and exactly HOW they impact planets conjunct it)*******

    I will definitely be writing more on this subject because I don’t think it’s talked about enough in Astrology or used enough in practice. All of this research is to be able to use the GC better, and to understand it better. For now though, I have made some videos on some stuff about the GC that has been noticed by both myself and Natalie (I will link them below for anyone who is interested in order). Eventually I will write out the stuff that I talk about in the videos, lol, at some point. If you only wanna watch one, I would watch the 5th one…this stuff is really on my radar right now at the moment.

    If anyone wants to be a part of the research, email me and let me know 🙂 I’ll send you the questionnaire that we shot to people via reddit.

    More to come….later…..as the research unfolds.

    If you would like a reading from me, you can click this to make that happen 🙂 and I can incorporate the Galactic Center (and other Galactics) into the reading.

    Edited to add (September 10, 2026) – Since writing this post over 5-years ago I have learned a whole bunch about the Galactic Center (and other galactic points) through the research. If you would like to learn A LOT of what I’ve learned about the Galactic Center and friends, take my Galactic Grand Cross class/lecture (this was a live class which took place on July 9, 2026). When you purchase this lecture, you will also get the notes that students received before the live class.